Gambar Penipuan Manusia

cecada

Sori kalau dah ada sebelum ni... Ni ada beberapa gambar tipu yang cukup terkenal suatu ketika dahulu.... Ada juga yang bertahan sehingga hari ini... Biasalah, bukan semua orang terdedah dengan dunia penipuan ini...

1. Sea Serpent



In 1906 this sea serpent was found on the beach at Ballard, Washington. These men are shown proudly holding it up for display. The serpent looks suspiciously like the trunk of a tree.

(gambar ni jelas sekali nampak macam batang pokok)

2. The Venezuelan Ape Man



A Swiss geologist named Fran鏾is de Loys photographed this creature in Venezuela sometime around 1920. He claimed that the creature was a tailless, five-foot tall ape which he had encountered (and killed) in the jungle. The problem is that apes are not native to the Americas. The actual finding of one would have thrown the entire theory of primate evolution into disarray. Therefore, the scientific community concluded this photo was a fake.
Above: A supposedly tailless, five-foot tall ape photographed in Venezuela by Fran鏾is de Loys, a Swiss geologist, sometime around 1920. The picture caused an uproar in the scientific community, because only monkeys, not apes, are believed to inhabit the Americas. If genuine, the finding of such an ape would have thrown into confusion the accepted theory of primate evolution.
According to de Loys, he encountered the ape when he was exploring the Venezuelan wilderness between 1917 and 1920. He had reached the Catatumbo River in the Sierra de Perija forest when two red-haired apes wandered out of the forest and confronted him. They walked upright, like humans, were approximately five-foot tall, and had no tails. Furthermore, they appeared angry, and began throwing dirt at the group of explorers, as if preparing to attack. De Loys immediately picked up his rifle and shot one of them. The other ape fled back into the forest.
Realizing that an American ape was an important zoological find, de Loys took a picture of the creature seated on an oil can, a long stick holding up its head. He then did his best to preserve the creature's remains, though he lacked the necessary tools to do so.
Months later, de Loys made it back to civilization. Unfortunately, by this time he had lost the ape's remains during an attack by a group of Motilones Indians. However, he still had the picture.
Nine years later an account of de Loys' encounter with the tailless ape, accompanied by the above photograph, was published in the Illustrated London News. It immediately caused a scientific uproar.
The Paris Academy of Sciences met to discuss de Loys' discovery. The accepted theory of primate evolution held that apes and humans had evolved only in the Old World (in Africa, in particular). The discovery of a New World ape would have seriously complicated this theory.
After long deliberation and discussion of the evidence, the scientists decided that the picture taken by de Loys did not display a species of ape. Instead, it showed a sapajou, a common New World monkey. The only evidence that it was not a sapajou was its size (for which they only had de Loys' word), and its lack of a tail (which de Loys could have concealed or cut off).
It is not clear whether de Loys intended to intentionally hoax the scientific community, or whether he really did discover an unusual creature inhabiting the forests of Venezuala. Since no concrete evidence has emerged in the decades following de Loys' discovery to demonstrate the existence of such a creature, it seems likely that de Loys was either mistaken about what he saw or that his picture was a deliberate hoax.

(Ramai dah tertipu ni)

3. Death in the Air



4. This picture comes from Death in the Air: The War Diary and Photographs of a Flying Corps Pilot. When it was published in 1933 this book caused a sensation because of the spectacular photos of World War I aerial combat that it contained. It wasn't until 1984 that the photos were discovered to be fake. All the planes seen in the photos were actually models superimposed on aerial backgrounds.

(tertipu lagi)

5. The Surgeon's Photo



A photograph supposedly of the Loch Ness monster taken by Robert Kenneth Wilson, a British gynecologist, on April 19, 1934 at around 7:30 AM. Because of Wilson's profession, the picture came to be known as "The Surgeon's Photo." In 1994 it was revealed that the picture actually shows a toy submarine outfitted with the head of a sea serpent.

(lagi-lagi tertipu)

[ Last edited by  amazed at 23-5-2009 13:37 ]

cecada

4. The Brown Lady of Raynham







This picture, taken in 1936 by two photographers for Country Life magazine, is one of the most famous ghost photos ever taken. The ghost in the image is known as the "Brown Lady" of Raynham Hall. The Brown Lady is supposedly the ghost of Lady Townshend who was imprisoned in the Hall by her husband. Skeptics argue that this image was created by superimposing two pictures on top of each other.
The Brown Lady of Raynham

The picture immediately to the right was taken in 1936. It purports to show the ghost of the 'Brown Lady' who haunts Raynham Hall in England. The image is widely believed to be one of the best and most convincing of all the known photographs of ghosts. In many publications it is presented as actual photographic proof of the existence of ghosts.

According to legend, the Brown Lady of Raynham is the ghost of Lady Townshend who was married to Charles Townshend, a man known for his fiery temper. When Charles learned of his wife's infidelity, he punished her by imprisoning her in the family estate at Raynham Hall, located in Norfolk, England. He never allowed her to leave its premises, not even to see her children. She remained there until her death, when she was an old woman.

Over the next two centuries Lady Townshend's ghost was repeatedly sighted wandering through Raynham Hall, suggesting that she never left its premises even after her death.

For instance, in the early nineteenth century King George IV saw her while he was staying at the hall. He said that she stood beside his bed wearing a brown dress, and that her face was pale and her hair disheveled.

In 1835 Colonel Loftus sighted her. He was visiting the house for the Christmas holidays and was walking to his room late one night when he saw a figure standing in the hall in front of him. The figure was wearing a brown dress. He tried to see who the woman was, but she mysteriously disappeared.

The next week Colonel Loftus again saw the figure. This time, however, he got a better look at her. He said she was an aristocratic looking woman. She was wearing the same brown satin dress, and her skin glowed with a pale luminescence, but, to his horror, her eyes had been gouged out.

Colonel Loftus told others of his experience, and more people then came forward to say that they too had seen a strange figure. An artist drew a painting of the 'brown lady' (as she was now known), and this picture was then hung in the room where she was most frequently seen.

A few years later the novelist Captain Frederick Marryat was staying at Raynham Hall. He decided to spend the night in the room in which she was most frequently seen. He studied the painting of her and waited to see her, but she never appeared that night.

However, a few days later he was walking down an upstairs hallway with two friends when they suddenly saw the brown lady. She was carrying a lantern and glided past them as they cowered behind a door. According to Marryat she grinned at them in a 'diabolical manner'. Before she disappeared, Marryat leapt out from behind the door and fired at her with a pistol that he happened to be carrying. The bullet passed through her and lodged in a wall.

The brown lady continued to be sighted by various people over the next century. However, the most remarkable sighting of her occurred on September 19, 1936.

Two photographers, Captain Provand and Indre Shira, were on assignment at Raynham Hall for the magazine Country Life. According to Shira, this is what happened:

"Captain Provand took one photograph while I flashed the light. He was focusing for another exposure; I was standing by his side just behind the camera with the flashlight pistol in my hand, looking directly up the staircase. All at once I detected an ethereal veiled form coming slowly down the stairs. Rather excitedly, I called out sharply: 'Quick, quick, there's something.' I pressed the trigger of the flashlight pistol. After the flash and on closing the shutter, Captain Provand removed the focusing cloth from his head and turning to me said: 'What's all the excitement about?'"

When they developed the picture they found that they had captured the image of a ghostly woman, apparently the famous brown lady, drifting down the stairs. The picture was published in Country Life on December 16, 1936.

Skeptics, however, argue that the picture is a fake. The photo analyst Joe Nickell examined the photograph and concluded that it was nothing more than two images composited together.

While the picture of her might be a fake, there is nothing to prove that the brown lady of Raynham herself isn't real, although she has rarely been sighted since 1936 (although the late Marchioness of Townshend told Dennis Bardens in the 1960s that she had seen the figure several times).

The absence of Lady Townshend from Raynham Hall may be due to the fact that she reportedly also haunts Sandringham House, and so it could be that she is simply choosing to spend her time there instead. At Sandringham she appears as her young, happy self, whereas in Raynham she appears as the eerie, aged brown lady.
(tipah tertipu lagi)



6. Bigfoot







Shown here is frame 352 of the famous Patterson-Gimlin film, shot in October 1967. It appears to document a female bigfoot striding along a riverbank in northern California. Maybe Bigfoot really does exist, but rumors have persistently credited the creature filmed by Patterson/Gimlin as the work of John Chambers. He was the lead make-up artist on the original Planet of the Apes, which was also filmed in 1967



7. Snowball the Monster Cat




This image began circulating around the internet in early 2000. A caption explained that the cat was Snowball, an 87-pound behemoth whose mother had lived near a nuclear power plant. In reality, the cat was named Jumper and was normal-sized. Its owner created the image as a joke to share with a few friends, never realizing that the joke would spread beyond his control and end up being shared by millions of e-mail users.



7. Shark Attack







The dramatic image on the top made its way around the internet in 2001. It did not depict an actual event. The shark had simply been pasted into the bottom shot of a hovering U.S. Air Force helicopter.



(gambar sebenarnya...)


[ Last edited by  cecada at 14-6-2007 01:05 PM ]

cecada

8. Touristguy



Millions of people shared this image through e-mail soon after the events of September 11, 2001. Some accompanying text explained that the photo had been recovered from a camera found in the rubble of the World Trade Center. Apparently a tourist had taken this shot moments before the first hijacked plane hit the building. But, not surprisingly, the picture was fake.



(boleh jugak buat macam ni)



Itu je la buat masa ni.... kalau ada lagi, nanti saya post ye...

[ Last edited by  cecada at 14-6-2007 02:52 PM ]

nameloo

nak lagi......
nak lagik.....

fa_aroy

Kat dalam majalah Kreko keluaran terbaru ada pasal penipuan

emOtsuXX

ramai tahu tu gambar tipu..

[ Last edited by  emOtsuXX at 17-6-2007 07:21 AM ]

alphawolf

Oh pleasee la.....

Halilintar

[quote]Originally posted by fa_aroy at 15-6-2007 10:53 AM
Kat dalam majalah Kreko keluaran terbaru ada pasal penipuan

sayangidaku

zaman dulu2 mmg senang nak tipu. sbb komputer belum ada. jd apa2 gmbo pelik org cepat terima.
tp zaman skang susah la org nak caya lagi.
kdg gmbo real pon org ingat superimposed.

sayangidaku

korang lupa satu lg gmbo hoax plg popular dlu2.

kat sini> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cottingley_Fairies

sayangidaku

kalo zaman ni sasah org senang2 je tau gmbo tu mmg tipu. tp zaman dlu2 tkde komputer2 ni kan...so org pecaya la bulat2.
budak2 pompan tu just cut gmbo fairies pstu gntung kat pokok..n then derang amik gmbo kat situ.
kire kreatif gakla. hehe...

Interesting.........:hmm:

JohnRambuRamba

bagus2..baru haku tau aku bykkena tipu..hehh

penpink

Originally posted by sayangidaku at 18-6-2007 01:39 AM
korang lupa satu lg gmbo hoax plg popular dlu2.

kat sini> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cottingley_Fairies

Yang ni aku tahu....aku tak ingat aku baca kat mana...tapi budak ni memang berfantasy.....konon2 dia dakwa diri dia rapat dgn pari2 yg comel.......sebenarnya dia just tampal gambar pari2 tu.....
Budak ni suka berkhayal........(IF I NOT MISTAKEN LAH...dah lama...ingat2 lupa...)

Dimarmalam

Ada gak penipuan menggunakan gambar cik pon paling popular.
yang peliknya muka cik pon yang sama kat foto yang berlainan..

huhuhu tipah tertipu.

ruz

Originally posted by penpink at 20-6-2007 09:11



Yang ni aku tahu....aku tak ingat aku baca kat mana...tapi budak ni memang berfantasy.....konon2 dia dakwa diri dia rapat dgn pari2 yg comel.......sebenarnya dia just tampal gambar pari2牋...

dia hisap syabu ke.....

homer_simpson

tp hoax gmbar bidadari ni mnunjukkan betapa low nya teknologi mase tu.. hu3.. skarang skali tgk je da tau gmbar tipu..

hyphrigian

70 tahun plus kot baru dia ni bagitau yang gambaq tu palsu....

akunie

Originally posted by sayangidaku at 18-6-2007 01:39 AM
korang lupa satu lg gmbo hoax plg popular dlu2.

kat sini> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cottingley_Fairies

Aku pun pernah cari makhluk ni masa kecik.

ChildrenOfBodom

Originally posted by sayangidaku at 18-6-2007 01:39 AM
korang lupa satu lg gmbo hoax plg popular dlu2.

kat sini> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cottingley_Fairies

yg ni ada dlm Mastika lama dah,tahun 97-98 antara penipuan paling famous.
pari2 tu sebenarnya digunting drp majalah dan kemudian dilekatkan kat rumput