|
|
US cannot Petrol Selat melaka without Malaysia and Indonesia concent
[Copy link]
|
|
|
Originally posted by Debmey at 7-6-2004 14:43:
How can yu stop terrorists when yu can't stop pirates?
Singapore waters reported no piracy for teh last few years. What abt Msia?
Because there are no pirates want to operate there. As I have said regarding the two scenario. Not because your SAF is good at tackling the issue. If SAF is good, and if there might be prirate and you can see many pirates kena arrested liao right. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our police & navy chase lots of pirates out of Singapore waters all the time. Thats why they can't operate in Singapore waters. What abt Msia? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originally posted by Debmey at 7-6-2004 15:26:
Our police & navy chase lots of pirates out of Singapore waters all the time. Thats why they can't operate in Singapore waters. What abt Msia?
Is it??? How come never heard of it before???? We have our weakness but that doesn't mean that we are not capable of defending ourselves. That doesn't mean that SAF or the USAF is any more capable in handling the whole situation.
Whatever it is, US have no right and cannot petrol Selat Melaka.
[ Last edited by ariyamusafir on 7-6-2004 at 11:27 PM ] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ariya..it's no lie that there's lesser pirate activities in Singapore as compared to Malaysia...You just check out areas around Sabah and Sarawak..and there's tonnes of pirate activities until it has become a norm for the outskirt fishing villages...
[ Last edited by Seraphim on 7-6-2004 at 11:28 PM ] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originally posted by Seraphim at 7-6-2004 23:27:
Ariya..it's no lie that there's lesser pirate activities in Singapore as compared to Malaysia...You just check out areas around Sabah and Sarawak..and there's tonnes of pirate activities until it h ...
I know ar, you didn't read along from the beginning what me and Deb talking is it? Then just a read first.....
What you working anyway? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stinkin pride results in more loss of property and lives in SOM. Terrorist will take advantage of their pride.
peace |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originally posted by Debmey at 8-6-2004 00:08:
Stinkin pride results in more loss of property and lives in SOM. Terrorist will take advantage of their pride.
peace
This is not stinking pride. This is an issue of our soverignity. Also, asking the Americans here will not help. The war on terror must be fought using a combination of hard and soft power and that is what the US had failed. US is not experienced in uprooting terrorism together with its cause. US only knows how to use brute force but not the right way to combat terror. Thus US had failed in its war on terror and with US in this region it will not help in our war on terror but will only cause the situation to deteriorate further. It is American's stinking pride that has caused much desention against them and it is their stupid ego pride which causes them to fail in their war on terror.
By the way, I tought you say SAF so strong, why need USAF???? Can't just SAF join in the crowd with its military might enough already??? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thats stinking pride alright. you can't solve the problem and yu don't allow others to help you.
Stinks like hell man.
Fortunately, the Msian govt isn't as stupid as you. They simply fool you. Hahahahahahahahahahaha...................
cheers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originally posted by Debmey at 8-6-2004 02:03:
Thats stinking pride alright. you can't solve the problem and yu don't allow others to help you.
Stinks like hell man.
Fortunately, the Msian govt isn't as stupid as you. They simply fool you ...
Stinking pride. We have not much problem and we do not need help. US don't even have much experience in that compared to us and it even can't help itself what more it wants to help us??? We have not much problem and we do not need their help. We do not need them with their imperialism here. What happened to the mighty SAF??? Can't take up the challenge which is so simple? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stinkin pride, thats what it is. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originally posted by Debmey at 8-6-2004 02:31:
Stinkin pride, thats what it is.
Stinking pride? It was America's stinking pride that got us this trouble of terrorism. It was America's stinking pride that lay us in such a mess. It was America's stinking pride that causes it to wage war here and there, it was their own stinking pride. It is also your stinking pride to boast about the might of your SAF when it is not that mighty. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originally posted by Debmey at 8-6-2004 02:31:
Stinkin pride, thats what it is.
Tell me, why don't SAF participate if it is so mighty. We will not let our soverignity be threatened by third parties. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If Singapore is inadequate in its defence, we will allow third parties to be in our territory. We had British and NZ forces stationed here before and we have US forces here now. We don't have bad stinking like yours. We know our limitations & are humble. You are a sick fool. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WICKED This user has been deleted
|
|
You already know your limitations..yeah that must be true...how limited is your capability to handle the situation with lack of SAF officers the reason why you need help from 3 parties like British, NZ & now US...it is not because you are humble..muahaha |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originally posted by Debmey at 8-6-2004 08:55:
If Singapore is inadequate in its defence, we will allow third parties to be in our territory. We had British and NZ forces stationed here before and we have US forces here now. We don't have bad s ...
If you say you are humble, you would not have boasted about your SAF being soooo mighty when they are not. It is not about we having stinky pride. We are just better then the US in handling terrorirsm and with US here, the issue will become very bad compared to if they are not here. What will happen is that they will bring battles here. When we tackle the small uprising, our General won the war without having to fight a single battle. As Sun Zi has taught that the best way to win a war is winning by not having to fight a single battle(if not mistaken). The leader of Al-Maunah surrendered peacefully. The General when in to talk and he gave up unconditionally. Lasted only a few days. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We are humble. But we are also not ignorant of our own ability. Unlike you who is ignorant of yours and want to boast.
cheers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originally posted by Debmey at 8-6-2004 22:55:
We are humble. But we are also not ignorant of our own ability. Unlike you who is ignorant of yours and want to boast.
cheers
We had experience. We had done it before and we know it. We know our own strength but at the same time we will not allow our soverignity to be threatened. I thought you said the Singapore's military so mighty??? What happened now? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The result of the poll shows, Debmey! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We know that Msian navy can't do the job, thats why yu need American help. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originally posted by Debmey at 9-6-2004 12:12:
We know that Msian navy can't do the job, thats why yu need American help.
Oh is it? We had experience in tackling Al-Maunah where the leader surrendered himself unconditionally after one of the Malaysian Generals went in and talk to him, a war won without having to fight a single battle. The issue was over in a matter of days.
How pula US solve problem? Their way of solving problems only cause the problem to deteriorate. You ought to know that military supremecy is not always the tool to use. This is where US failed badly. How can one who fails in tackling the problem teached the method they use on those who had succeed, when they have failed and their methods have failed?
[ Last edited by ariyamusafir on 9-6-2004 at 12:19 PM ] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Author
Post time 7-6-2004 03:26 PM
