|
|
IPHONE 5... Available in malaysia on 14/12/12
[Copy link]
|
|
|
freebird posted on 12-9-2012 10:56 AM 
jeng, jeng, jeng...separuh masa kedua akan bermula sebentar lagi....
Yes!! mintak2 samsung saman apple lebih dari keuntungan tahunan epal.. mintak2 lagi tinggi dari samsung kena bayar... silap2 epal takde langsung teknologi 4g derang mwahahahahhahaha aku suka
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
dino posted on 12-9-2012 02:09 PM
bukan ke dlm imac mmg dah lama ade mission control... maksudnya fungsi tu dah lama ade dlm OSX.... ...
yup.. dalam IMAC dan macbook memang dah lama ada mission control
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cakkkk....aaaa posted on 12-9-2012 04:03 PM
yup.. dalam IMAC dan macbook memang dah lama ada mission control
so pengguna android jgn ngada2 kata semua tiru diorang 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
dino posted on 12-9-2012 04:41 PM
ni china la ni.... suka2 je letak iphone jd dapur masuk
p/s; dah beli nanti bgtau yea
...
femes epal ko nyah... sampai kan dapur masak pun epal ada buat. ni dah ikan patinkan ke belum nih? kang brand Singer buat dapur ni kang kena saman berjota2 henggat lak nanti 
p/s nexo tak beli lagi ler... si dino tu haaa.. kita dok tanya dari tadi,... dah beli ke? boleh ke dino tau bila nexo berak meletop letap nanti kalu nexo update kan status nature call nexo? mana tau kot2 nexo kena uplot pakai safari lak nanti kan? kan nexo pakai endroit..
Last edited by nexusys on 12-9-2012 04:47 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apple lawyer tells jury: Samsung’s three months of copying ripped off a 4-year investment in iPhone
The story of Samsung’s copying, said Apple lawyer Harold McElhinny, was told in Samsung’s own documents. He ran through the competitive analysis from inside Samsung that showed the company was worried about its user interface technology. There was the e-mail from the designer who talked about a "difference of Heaven and Earth" between the iPhone and a Samsung phone; the same e-mail talked about a "crisis of design" at the company.
That crisis kicked off a period of "intense copying," said McElhinny. "In those three months, Samsung was able to copy Apple's 4-year investment in the iPhone, without taking any of the risks—because they were copying the world's most successful product."
The competitive analysis document, translated from Korean, came up more than once; it looked at successful iPhone features and suggested how Samsung could react to them (although, the document specifically recommended "differentiating" at points.)
Samsung didn’t send key witnesses, McElhinny said—like the designer who made the first Galaxy phone. "Samsung put on no witness who even admitted to seeing, much less writing, the copying documents we showed you," said McElhinny. "Instead of witnesses, they sent you lawyers."
When it came to proving the trade dress case, McElhinny cited a survey showing people returning Samsung products to Best Buy, sometimes mistakenly believing they had purchased iPads.
Like his opening, McElhinny’s closing pitch to jurors was part sales pitch, and used many of the same laudatory press clips about Apple products that had been shown to the jury earlier. "Even Samsung thought the iPhone changed the world," noted McElhinny excitedly, referring to an internal Samsung document. "An obvious design is not called ‘revolutionary’ by the company’s biggest competitor."
As for the prior art that Samsung had said showed Apple’s patents were invalid, McElhinny was dismissive: "It's hard to imagine holding the Diamond Touch in your hand and making a phone call," he scoffed.
When it came time to wield the damages hammer, McElhinny didn’t hold back. "Samsung makes fun of our damages claim," he said. "They make fun of us asking for billions of dollars." But two serious factors are driving Apple’s $2.75 billion damages request, he said: first, Samsung has sold 22.7 million infringing phones and tablets in the US—that’s 30,000 units per day in the relevant period. Those have generated $8.16 billion in revenue, McElhinny said.
"The damages in this case should be large—because the infringement has been massive," he said.
Samsung to jury: Apple’s lawsuit is an attack on free competition
Samsung’s closing was led by Charles Verhoeven, the same lawyer who did the opening and handled many key cross-examinations. Verhoeven bashed Apple experts like Susan Kare, calling them paid experts who didn’t really do serious studies or talk to people.
Before he did that, though, he spent a few minutes attacking Apple’s motives in bringing this lawsuit.
"Apple is here," Verhoeven began, "asking you to prevent its largest competitor from giving consumers what they want—smartphones with big screens. So, why is Apple doing this? Because its patents are being infringed? Both companies have thousands of patents."
Verhoeven got straight to it, suggesting another motive. "Rather than compete in the marketplace, Apple is seeking a competitive edge through the courtroom," he said. Apple is suing more than 20 products, and looking to get over $2.7 billion, he reminded the jury. "It’s seeking to block its biggest and most serious competitor from even attending the game."
Then he launched into a mom-and-apple-pie speech, Silicon Valley-style. Verhoeven continued:
"Look out there in the pews. You see all those reporters? Why are they here? They're here because of your decision. Ladies and gentlemen, if you go Apple’s way, you could change the way competition works in this country. Is this country going to have vigorous competition between competitors? Or giant conglomerates with thousands of patents that block competitors?"
"Sure Apple has great products—we don't deny that," said Verhoeven. "But competition is what built this country, and we can see it for ourselves here in Silicon Valley."
Apple’s case about copying has been a type of "shell game," he said—using old or inapplicable documents to prove different points. Slides that Apple had shown, with older, blockier Samsung phones before the 2007 introduction of the iPhone—and sleeker ones after 2007—were "an intentional attempt to mislead the jury," said Verhoeven. Samsung had large-screen phones before 2007, but Apple had chosen not to include them.
He reviewed the testimony of Samsung designer Jin Soo Kim, who had said that Samsung began developing the Galaxy Tab in October 2009, several months before the iPad was shown to the public. "And they called him a copyist," said Verhoeven, incredulous.
Apple’s final rebuttal: "Make your own designs. Make your own phones."
The contention that Apple doesn’t want to compete is "startling… and it is wrong," said Bill Lee, the Apple lawyer who delivered a final rebuttal.
"No one is trying to stop them from selling smartphones," he said. "All we're saying is: make your own. Make your own designs, make your own phones, and compete on your own innovations."
Suggesting that competition in America would fall apart from a pro-Apple verdict is nothing but a scare tactic, Lee said. Samsung wanted to take the patent laws the jury had just spent the last two and a half hours being instructed on and "throw them out the window," he said. "We can’t do that, because the Constitution says we have to have them, to protect innovation."
And Apple’s damage demand isn’t too high considering how much Samsung has made. "They copied our products and made $8 billion," said Lee. "What they're saying to you now is—‘We want you to let us keep all $8 billion. The number for you to focus on is $8 billion, and the question is, do they get a get-out-of-jail free card?"
The McElhinny came back in, giving his own spin on Verhoeven's "future of innovation" speech.
"If you find for Apple in this case, you will have re-affirmed the American patent system," said McElhinny. "eople in this valley will continue to invest. They will take chances—because they know their investment will be protected."
A big verdict against Samsung would indeed change the world, said McElhinny. But it wouldn't harm competition—it would send a message that copying isn't the right way to compete. "If you award us the damages we are seeking, you will have upended Samsung's cynical game plan," he said. "You will have taken the profit away from them. You will have taught Samsung and everyone else that has gone down that road: that's not the way to profit."
The jury now has the case, and will return to the San Jose courthouse tomorrow morning to begin its deliberations.
Last edited by dino on 12-9-2012 04:52 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
nexusys posted on 12-9-2012 04:46 PM
femes epal ko nyah... sampai kan dapur masak pun epal ada buat. ni dah ikan patinkan ke belum nih? ...
blum beli lg la app ipoo tu.... ade ke org sudi nak share statistik berak ngan kite nih
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
dino posted on 12-9-2012 12:52 PM
colorfull banner tu katanya icon2 yg distrech..... yg bawa maksud larger screen..... kagum ngan ...
Sampaikan langsir kat pejabat epal pun derang kaji.....mmg taksub tul ler bebudak epal nih...thanks for sharing dino... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tossee posted on 12-9-2012 04:54 PM
Sampaikan langsir kat pejabat epal pun derang kaji.....mmg taksub tul ler bebudak epal nih...thank ...
welkam.... nanti samsung tiru la style apple nih..... kena sue lg
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
dino posted on 12-9-2012 04:57 PM
welkam.... nanti samsung tiru la style apple nih..... kena sue lg
Kompem...kalo opis samsen pakai langsir jew...terus sampai surat saman...idea pasang langsir kat tingkap ofis adalah idea mutlak epal kekdahnye..syarikat laen takleh tiru.... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
dino posted on 12-9-2012 04:52 PM
blum beli lg la app ipoo tu.... ade ke org sudi nak share statistik berak ngan kite nih
cam ai ni redah jek kalau nak berkongsi status berak ai nih... lumrah hidup kan? dino walaupun pakai nama stok binatang liar suatu ketika dulu pun, bengis, anker dan ganas, tapi dino pasti akan berak jua tak kira di hotan mana dino pijak... sama la macam mendiang Pekerjaan Steve, se smart arse mana pun Steve tuh, dia pasti juga berak berketol ketal di jamban seramik dia ketika masih hidup dulu....
so nexo tak de masalah pom. Kenapa? Dino malu2 hog hog ka nak bagitau yg dino berak pakai ipoo app tuh?
p/s nama app pun stok hina apple jah, pasti pengguna epal tak senang dengan developer nih, hina religious derang kekdahnya.. jual app utk endroit user pun bangga jah tanda sapot penghinaan kununnya
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
nexusys posted on 12-9-2012 05:04 PM
cam ai ni redah jek kalau nak berkongsi status berak ai nih... lumrah hidup kan? dino walaupun pak ...
jgn hina app tu okeh.... dlm android pun ade...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
hape2 jer lah gayah2 ni duk merepek... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
dino posted on 12-9-2012 05:25 PM
hrp bukan aku yg dimaksudkan
pakar psychology dan sociology patut buat kajian pasal apple vs android nih.
mcm dendam kesumat tak sudah...nak beli beli, tak nak tok sah la melalak ke hulu ke hilir.mcm kurang kasih sayang pun ada. this goes for both sides actually...
pengeluar pun elok jah boleh share buat parts walaupun berlambak case saman/counter saman
tapi pengguna sangat childish...
Last edited by Cakkkk....aaaa on 12-9-2012 05:31 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
malam ni kul 2 ya dino?
hope for the best.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cakkkk....aaaa posted on 12-9-2012 05:33 PM
malam ni kul 2 ya dino?
hope for the best..
harap2 kat tanah air lambat keluar nanti, jikalau ada modal lebih saya boleh buat uang beli 1-2 set di temasek dan jual mark up tinggi
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changa posted on 12-9-2012 05:38 PM
harap2 kat tanah air lambat keluar nanti, jikalau ada modal lebih saya boleh buat uang beli 1-2 se ...
heepppppp... mula lah tu...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Post time 12-9-2012 03:50 PM
Author
