Anti-mosque protests

blastoff

so not going out to vote is a better option?
kucingblue Post at 31-7-2010 11:39

Mengundi bukankah bermakna pengundi tu memberi approval kepada calon tu untuk mewakilinya di congress sekiranya calon tu menang kelak ?

Kau ingat kategori pemimpin hanya terpakai pada presiden saja ka ? Ahli2 congress, senators, representatives tu semua bukan pemimpin jugak ka walau peringkat sebawah mana sekali pun ? Dan siapa yang undi mereka agar mereka dapat pegang jawatan mereka tu kalau bukan rakyat Amerika ?

33:67 And they will say: “O our Sustainer! Behold, we paid heed unto our leaders and our great men, and it is they who have led us astray from the right path!

The best option Allah dah beri pada mereka yakni menerima Allah dan Rasul sebagai pembuat keputusan bagi setiap urusan hidup mereka  , bukannya menyerahkan urusan mereka kepada members of the congress yang di kuasai oleh rejim zionist tu. Tak bawa kebaikan pada diri mereka vote yang mereka beri pada para pemimpin mereka tu .

Dasar policy congress Amerika semua boleh faham kerana mereka declare nya secara terang-terangan .



-----------------------------------------
http://www.haaretz.com/news/nearly-300-congress-members-declare-commitment-to-unbreakable-u-s-israel-bond-1.266652

Nearly 300 Congress members declare commitment to 'unbreakable' U.S.-Israel bond

Letter to Clinton underscores Biden remarks that there is 'no space' when it comes to Israel's security.

By Natasha Mozgovaya

Nearly 300 members of Congress have signed on to a declaration reaffirming their commitment to "the unbreakable bond that exists between [U.S.] and the State of Israel", in a letter to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

The letter was sent in the wake of the severe recent tensions between Israel and the U.S. over the prior's decision to construct more than 1,600 new housing units in East Jerusalem, a project it announced during U.S. Vice President Joe Biden's visit to the region. [/url]

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu took advantage of his trip to the United States this week to try to mend the rift with the Obama administration, but he was greeted with cold welcome by the White House.
Netanyahu also met during his visit with members of Congress, who welcomed him with significantly more warmth.

The letter from Congress expresses its "deep concern" over the U.S.-Israel crisis, and emphasizes that lawmakers had received assurances from Netanyahu that the events leading up to the recent tensions would not be repeated.

Letter from members of Congress

Dear Secretary Clinton:

We are writing to reaffirm our commitment to the unbreakable bond that exists between our country and the State of Israel and to express to you our deep concern over recent tension. In every important relationship, there will be occasional misunderstandings and conflicts.

The announcement during Vice President Biden's visit was, as Israel's Prime Minister said in an apology to the United States, "a regrettable incident that was done in all innocence and was hurtful, and which certainly should not have occurred." We are reassured that Prime Minister Netanyahu's commitment to put in place new procedures will ensure that such surprises, however unintended, will not recur.

The United States and Israel are close allies whose people share a deep and abiding friendship based on a shared commitment to core values including democracy, human rights and freedom of the press and religion. Our two countries are partners in the fight against terrorism and share an important strategic relationship.

A strong Israel is an asset to the national security of the United States and brings stability to the Middle East. We are concerned that the highly publicized tensions in the relationship will not advance the interests the U.S. and Israel share. Above all, we must remain focused on the threat posed by the Iranian nuclear weapons program to Middle East peace and stability.

From the moment of Israel's creation, successive U.S. administrations have appreciated the special bond between the U.S. and Israel.

For decades, strong, bipartisan Congressional support for Israel, including security assistance and other important measures, have been eloquent testimony to our commitment to Israel's security, which remains unswerving.

It is the very strength of this relationship that has, in fact, made Arab-Israeli peace agreements possible, both because it convinced those who sought Israel?s destruction to abandon any such hope and because it gave successive Israeli governments the confidence to take calculated risks for peace.

In its declaration of independence 62 years ago, Israel declared: "We extend our hand to all neighboring states and their peoples in an offer of peace and good neighborliness, and appeal to them to establish bonds of cooperation and mutual help with the sovereign Jewish people settled in its own land."

In the decades since, despite constantly having to defend itself from attack, Israel has repeatedly made good on that pledge by offering to undertake painful risks to reach peace with its neighbors.

Our valuable bilateral relationship with Israel needs and deserves constant reinforcement.

As the Vice-President said during his recent visit to Israel: "Progress occurs in the Middle East when everyone knows there is simply no space between the U.S. and Israel when it comes to security, none. No space."

Steadfast American backing has helped lead to Israeli peace treaties with Egypt and Jordan. And American involvement continues to be critical to the effort to achieve peace between Israel and the Palestinians.

We recognize that, despite the extraordinary closeness between our country and Israel, there will be differences over issues both large and small.

Our view is that such differences are best resolved quietly, in trust and confidence, as befits longstanding strategic allies. We hope and expect that, with mutual effort and good faith, the United States and Israel will move beyond this disruption quickly, to the lasting benefit of both nations.

We believe, as President Obama said, that "Israel's security is paramount" in our Middle East policy and that "it is in U.S. national security interests to assure that Israel's security as an independent Jewish state is maintained."

In that spirit, we look forward to working with you to achieve the common objectives of the U.S. and Israel, especially regional security and peace.

Sincerely,
STENY HOYER ERIC CANTOR
HOWARD L. BERMAN ILEANA ROS-LEHTINEN
GARY ACKERMAN DAN BURTON

ape cerita? Keluar mengundi pon dikira menyokong pembunuhan umat Islam kat middle east. jauh gak ko merewang.
kucingblue Post at 31-7-2010 11:39

Saya tak kata semua yang pergi mengundi tu menyokong pembunuhan , yang saya kata adalah semua yang mengundi tu bersubahat dalam menegakkan sistem politik batil kerana mereka menurut kehendak pemimpin2 sesat lagi menyesatkan yang menyuruh mereka keluar mengundi tu   . Ada faham ?

Kalo camtu aku nak accuse ko pon same, sebab chances are, the computer u use to come here is made by US companies. At least the components, at least the technology. So dengan menggunakan produk US ko pon sama. Amacam? Gee.
kucingblue Post at 31-7-2010 11:39 [url=http://forum.cari.com.my/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=39718291&ptid=496375]

Ada Allah sebut product seperti komputer yang dibuat oleh orang Amerika haram untuk kita beli ? Mana dalil naqli nya ?

blastoff

what??? nevermind, just say whatever u want.
kucingblue Post at 31-7-2010 11:49

Pada tahun 93 bukankah pernah berlaku serangan bom guna trak di basement WTC? Mati lima dan cedera seribu orang serta berlubang besar basement tu jadinya  ... immediately lepas kejadian tu kerajaan Amerika menuding jari pada terrorist berbangsa arab.

So kalau dah pernah berlaku gitu maka tidakkah ketika 9/11 kerajaan Amerika sepatutnya perlu expect kejadian tu akan berulang lagi, memandangkan kalau terrorist mampu keluar duit jalani training pilot untuk hijack kapal terbang dan target bangunan tu secara tepat gitu , maka sudah tentulah terrorist lebih lebih lagi la mampu untuk sewa trak2 lalu isi bom dan letak di sekitar WTC pada hari kejadian tu untuk mewujudkan impact kemusnahan lebih hebat lagi .....

Tidak kah sepatutnya askar2 mereka perlu di kerah ke tempat kejadian bagi memastikan tak ada trak2 , van2, kereta2 etc yang penuh bom di kawasan tu ? Sebab pernah berlaku pada 93' maka kalau 9/11 pun angkara terrorist maka tak mustahil lah untuk kejadian serangan darat gitu berulang lagi ketika tu .

Simple logik gitu pun depa tak boleh fikir ka ? Apa yang menyebabkan kerajaan Amerika begitu yakin tak ada trak penuh bom di situ pada waktu 9/11 tu ?

blastoff

Di Iraq boleh pulak mereka letak askar2 mereka untuk berkawal di every check point untuk memastikan tiada kereta bawa bom melaluinya ... takkan kat WTC mereka tak mampu ambil tindakan yang sama kot untuk menjaga keselamatan rakyat mereka sendiri yang trapped di bangunan tu yang masih hidup ketika tu ?

sirrikhafi

Pada hakikatnya, setiap negara itu mempunyai karakter bertentangan dengan nilai-nilai kemanusiaan. Negara menghancurkan solidaritas diantara manusia dan mempersatukan sebagian manusia hanya untuk menghancurkan, menguasai dan memperbudak sebagian lain manusia. Sebuah negara hanya melindungi warga negaranya, karena negara itu tidak mengakui hak-hak orang lain diluar batas kekuasannya. dan secara prinsipil, negara ini akan memperlakukan orang asing dengan semena-mena. Kalau negara itu memperlakukan orang asing tersebut dengan manusiawi, itu bukan karena kewajibannya: karena negara itu tidak mempunyai kewajiban kepada siapa pun, tetapi kepada ’dirinya’ sendiri dan warga negaranya, yang telah membentuknya.

Sekarang kita dapat melihat kontradiksi antara nilai-nilai kemanusiaan dan prinsip kekuasaan negara dengan jelas sekali. Dalam sebuah negara, kekosongan nilai-nilai kemanusiaan dan moralitas diisi dengan sebuah konsep, yaitu, ’patriotisme". Patriotisme dapat kita kategorikan sebagai moralitas yang transenden, karena patriotisme adalah suatu moralitas yang tidak dapat dijelaskan dengan logika dan rationalitas. Umpamanya, merampok, menjajah, membunuh, bagi seseorang yang bermoral adalah suatu tindakan kriminal yang ganas, tetapi mungkin dilakukan oleh seorang patriotik.

Ini menjelaskan kepada kita mengapa sejak sejarah dimulai, sejak negara mulai dibentuk, dunia politik menjadi pentas penipuan dan perampokan -penipuan dan perampokan yang terpuji karena dilakukan atas nama patriotisme, moralitas transenden. Ini menjelaskan mengapa seluruh sejarah negara kuno dan moderen, tidaklah lebih dari rentetan tindakan kriminal yang memuakan; mengapa raja-raja, dan seluruh aparatus negara (menteri, diplomat, birokrat dan pahlawan) kalau diadili dari sudut pandang moralitas yang sebenarnya, patut dihukum seberat-beratnya.

Tidak ada satupun dari tindakan-tindakan seperti, teror, kekejaman, penipuan dan perampokan, yang tak pernah dilakukan oleh aparatus negara (dan sampai sekarang masih terus dilakukan), dengan alasan tidak lain dari "alasan kenegaraan". Pada saat institusi negara mengeluarkan "suara", semua bungkam,: harga diri, kejujuran, keadilan, hak asasi dan belas kasih, hilang, bersama dengan logika dan akal sehat; hitam jadi putih dan sebaliknya; kejahatan dan tindakan kriminal yang ganas dianggap sebagai perbuatan yang terpuji.

Saya bukanlah seorang komunis karena komunisme mempersatukan masyarakat dalam negara dan terserap di dalamnya; karena komunisme akan mengakibatkan konsentrasi kekayaan dalam negara, sedangkan saya ingin memusnahkan negara --pemusnahan semua prinsip otoritas dan kenegaraan, yang dalam kemunafikannya ingin membuat manusia bermoral dan berbudaya, tetapi yang sampai sekarang selalu memperbudak, mengeksploitasi dan menghancurkan mereka.

Mikhail bakunin.



WALLAHU A'LAM.

kucingblue

Mengundi bukankah bermakna pengundi tu memberi approval kepada calon tu untuk mewakilinya di con ...
blastoff Post at 31-7-2010 01:17

so you think that sume yg mengundi meredhakan pembunuhan orang awam kat negara Islam right? and you think that rakyat US majoritynya menentang Islam right? Alright, up to you.

kucingblue

so New York Landmark Preservation Commission voted unanimously against giving a landmark status to the building in question, clearing a way for the construction of the Mosque & Community Center.

and here's a speech after the fact, by Major Bloomberg and other religious leaders, coming together in support of the plan.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/20 ... liver_n_669395.html

Thumbs up for Mayor Bloomberg. Freedom of religion is indeed one of the most basic constitutional right this country is supposed to offer.