|
Ahahahahahahah................. looks like you have not even read the ahdiths, it didn't say pagans, it said monkeys. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originally posted by Debmey at 6-4-2004 07:50 PM:
Ahahahahahahah................. looks like you have not even read the ahdiths, it didn't say pagans, it said monkeys.
Ahahahahah uhuhuhu ehehehehe.... your stupid trademark as usual.
it stated there PRE-Islamic era... means PAGAN people, and now you said it wasn't pagan but monkey... so you meant the pagan people were monkey?
uhuhuhuhu ahahahaha ehehehehe |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it didn't say pagans were monkeys, it said monkeys. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
WICKED This user has been deleted
|
whatever lah debmey as long as you dont call yourself monkey and agree with charles darwin's theory. If you do, I like to recommend you to apply a new religion called scientology. LOL!
P/S please dont deduct my credit...huhuhu hahaha hehehe |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
But how can yu do that Wicked? How can you leave your holy tradituions to the dumps like that. The natural questions regarding the hadiths still remains up till now and are unanswered.
1. how did the sahabi know about the crime?
2. Did he talk to the monkeys?
3. Was he gifted enough with the ability of talking to animals?
4. Where was the he-monkey? Did it ran away, because after adultery whenever there is a possibility of punishment, running away with lightning speed is an eternal male culture.
5. Then, what should we understand by adultery of animals, birds, fish, etc.?
It all has to make sense in islam doesn't it? hwo can yu leave islam hanging in the air like that? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
WICKED This user has been deleted
|
who is blurr here? me or you... are you talking about bukhari or Amru bin Maimun or Sahabi? if you think im blurr how can i answer your question? prove it to me that the hadith are talking about muslim behaviour stoning the monkey because as far as i understand that the hadith talking about incident happened during PRE-ISLAMIC ERA..an era which people do unislamic behaviour, knowing that this behaviour is being done by the pagans I dont think I need to defend them, so why should I answer your stupid questions? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yea right WICKED, how could we defend stoning the moneky done by PAGAN... we are Muslim not PAGAN. Stupid question I agree |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
And the natural questions still remains up till now and are unanswered.
1. how did the sahabi know about the crime?
2. Did he talk to the monkeys?
3. Was he gifted enough with the ability of talking to animals?
4. Where was the he-monkey? Did it ran away, because after adultery whenever there is a possibility of punishment, running away with lightning speed is an eternal male culture.
5. Then, what should we understand by adultery of animals, birds, fish, etc.?
It all has to make sense in islam doesn't it? how can yu leave islam hanging in the air like that? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Some people is doing evasive actions because of inablity to answer questions...;) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
watever it is ... it was during the pre-lslamic period of ignorance... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'm glad that yu realised that those observations were pure ignorance. But the problem is, that ignorance was carried all the way to the islamic period, thats why its recorded in the hadiths by muslims.
And so the natural questions still remains up till now and are unanswered.
1. how did the sahabi know about the crime?
2. Did he talk to the monkeys?
3. Was he gifted enough with the ability of talking to animals?
4. Where was the he-monkey? Did it ran away, because after adultery whenever there is a possibility of punishment, running away with lightning speed is an eternal male culture.
5. Then, what should we understand by adultery of animals, birds, fish, etc.?
It all has to make sense in islam doesn't it? how can yu leave islam hanging in the air like that? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originally posted by Debmey at 8-4-2004 07:24 PM:
I'm glad that yu realised that those observations were pure ignorance. But the problem is, that ignorance was carried all the way to the islamic period, thats why its recorded in the hadiths by mus ...
Not only us, but thousand years ago prophet and Muslim consider that as ignorance...that's why recorded in Hadith and stated there clearly.
BUT... I just wonder why modern people who live thousand years ahead like you still ignore the simple fact that the act done by PRE-ISLAMIC period of ignoance... seems people in thousand years ago smarter than you... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thats not what the hadith said. You are trying to bluff.
anyhway, its good that you realised that the hadith is full of bluffs. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originally posted by Debmey at 8-4-2004 08:22 PM:
Thats not what the hadith said. You are trying to bluff.
anyhway, its good that you realised that the hadith is full of bluffs.
Is it me or you? everybody here can read you stupid!
PRE-ISLAMIC PERIOD OF IGNORANCE... stated there clearly...
so who is bluffing... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It doesn't say anything abt ignorance, yu better go back and read your hadith. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hahahahahahaha............... yu didn't read the hadith, it says that he didn't understood the stoning, it didn't say that the the vision was out of ignorance.
And so the natural questions still remains up till now and are unanswered.
1. how did the sahabi know about the crime?
2. Did he talk to the monkeys?
3. Was he gifted enough with the ability of talking to animals?
4. Where was the he-monkey? Did it ran away, because after adultery whenever there is a possibility of punishment, running away with lightning speed is an eternal male culture.
5. Then, what should we understand by adultery of animals, birds, fish, etc.?
It all has to make sense in islam doesn't it? how can yu leave islam hanging in the air like that? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originally posted by Debmey at 8-4-2004 10:23 PM:
Hahahahahahaha............... yu didn't read the hadith, it says that he didn't understood the stoning, it didn't say that the the vision was out of ignorance.
And so the natural questio ...
What a twisting and turning tounge you have.... wanna become Rice no II... hahahaha
The Hadith that you present was:
"During the pre-lslamic period of ignorance I saw a she-monkey surrounded by a number of monkeys. They were all stoning it, because it had committed illegal sexual intercourse. I too, stoned it along with them."
1. It happen during the PRE-ISLAMIC PERIOD OF IGNORANCE.. again and again we put it on BIG capital words.... for you to open your eyes and read that short words!
2. You said Vision out of ignorance? I dont understand what do you mean by that? Vision out of ignorance? LOL lol:lol
pls elaborate your lies clearly |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Those statements were made after islam was established not before.
What nonsence are you talking? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originally posted by Debmey at 8-4-2004 11:57 PM:
Those statements were made after islam was established not before.
The Statement maybe after Islam established, but it happened BEFORE....It says PRE-ISLAMIC PERIOD!!!
What nonsense you are talking about?
[ Last edited by kid on 9-4-2004 at 12:40 AM ] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|