|
|
aku pon rs down ckit sbb x terpikir nk speku psl doping ni..rela lg kalo dia retire...
terbayang2 players lain tersenyum sinisss je...hehehe
adoyaiii... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
naahh... i rasa players lain pun kesaspenan sbb derang semua mesti ada amik supplement bagai.. mesti derang dup dap2... takut laa ubatan derang tu tetiba kena ban dek WADA.
kita yg bukan atlit pun ada makan supplement nak improve itu ini.. qu puteh laa pamoga laa.. 
so skrg Masha kena return $500K that she won in AO 2016 QF. yg sebelum2 ni, she can keep sebab masa tu meldonium was not banned by WADA lagik
tak kiralah apa players lain yg dok kalah dgn Masha kata apa.. her past wins are still legal...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
kalau dia retire, adakah kes ni boleh senyap camtu jek?
salute la Masha for owning it up and not ending her career this way.
please do a Cilic... after returning from a drug ban, come back & win a major title. barulah tutup mulut orang ramai.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ahaiii.. sweetnyer laa fan Masha sorang ni.. 
bertuahlah gf/wifey yek 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
oh ok... salah pemahaman..
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We all make mistakes Maria, but if you need a shoulder to cry on, @ashburn here for you! 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Takde hal..
Who's next? 
Masha takde kuar nama bila org speku pasal doping sebelum ni. Nama2 lain ada...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
drug ni kena banned sebab ada potential cardiac effect
tapi dalam masa yg sama boleh 'enhancing the performance'
Coincidence?
i harap luck on her side.WADA adds drugs only once per year & Masha terima letter on Dec 22 detailing the changes and she didn't read.
A one year ban is acceptable. Kalau dia ambik drug tu up until 31 Dec..benda still legal.
You're not alone..take Martina Hingis as an example! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
wah uolls.i bagi 5 bintang kat uolls semua.dari pagi sampai ke petang harini semua komen pasal backup maria.
terharu iolls tgk fans maria kat sini.
takdak sapa pon sebut pasal lain,current tournament.kuat pengaruh maria sharapova ni.
sampai peminat2 dia kat sini sanggup tgk pengumuman langsung pukul 4 pagi.
tgk live 4 pagi tu OK lah.ni pengumuman pun rela bangun awal utk tgk live. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tu baru kat malaysia.imagine worldwide pulak mcm mana.dahsyat betul brand Maria Saharapova brand ni.
kuatnya pengaruh Maria Sharapova. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MerlinPendragon replied at 8-3-2016 05:51 PM
wah uolls.i bagi 5 bintang kat uolls semua.dari pagi sampai ke petang harini semua komen pasal backu ...
Kann..x sempat nk citer psl tournmnt IW..hehe |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
http://extrapharmacy.ru/buy-mildronate-online-meldonium
boleh beli online jer... xyah go thru FDA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tag Heuer ... Porsche ... dh ikut jejak Nike...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by Mulan at 8-3-2016 08:57 PM
Maria Sharapova revealed that she received a letter from the ITF saying that she'd failed a drug test at this year's Australian Open. (AP)
Maria's Mystifying Mistake
STEVE TIGNOR | TUESDAY, MARCH 8, 2016
Was she retiring? Was she ill? Was she rolling out a new line of athlete-approved candy? Speculation grew frenzied asMaria Sharapovawalked across what she would later call a “fairly ugly carpet” and stepped to the microphone ina Los Angeles hotel ballroom on Monday. But as she unfolded a white piece of paper and somberly thanked the press for showing up on short notice, few of us predicted what she would say next:
“I wanted to let you know that a few days ago, I received a letter from the ITF that I had failed a drug test at the Australian Open. I did fail the test, and I take full responsibility for it.”
This was a stunner on many levels. First, it has been been rare for any top tennis player to test positive for a performance-enhancing substance. Second, it’s even rarer for an athlete to make this type of announcement herself. Third, I hadn’t been aware of any widespread speculation or rumor in the past about Sharapova and PEDs.
All of which should only remind us, if we needed any more reminding, that no athlete, and no sport, is above suspicion.
As it happens, Sharapova’s positive drug test comes at a delicate moment for tennis. The game began 2016under a cloud ofmatch-fixing allegations, and now it has seen one of its best and most bankable players permanently damaged, as well as possibly banned for a significant length of time.
Yet when it comes to the game’s reputation, the Sharapova situation comes with a silver lining of sorts, even if it's hard to discern at the moment. When the match-fixing story played out in January, the most damning accusation wasn’t that there was criminal activity in tennis; it was that the game'sofficialslooked the other way and chose to preserve its reputation rather than reveal its seedy side. That has also been a concern with tennis’s drug-testing system: How stringent could it be if no players of importance were ever caught? Were we expected to believe that tennis, alone among professional sports, was as pure as its Wimbledon whites? Now we’ve seen that the testing system can catch a star.
Of course, this star was caught because she made what she rightly called a “huge mistake.” Sharapova says she had been taking adrug that she knew as mildronatesince 2006, when her “family doctor” prescribed it after she had suffered multiple bouts with the flu, received erratic EKG results, and was diagnosed with a “deficiency in magnesium” and “signs of diabetes." Sharapova said she was unaware that the drug, better known as meldonium, had been added toWADA’s banned substance list at the start of 2016, after the organization found “evidence of its use by athletes with the intention of enhancing performance.”
Perhaps the only thing that could have been more stunning than Sharapova telling us about her failed drug test was her explanation for whyit occurred.
“I received an email," she said, "on December 22, 2015, from WADA about the changes happening to the banned list, and you can see prohibited items, and I didn’t click on that link.”
By that point, all Sharapova could do was insult the carpet.
When she walked back across itand out of the room, we were left with as many questions as answers. How did a woman who lives in the U.S. end up using meldonium, a drug manufactured in Latvia and Russia and not approved by the FDA? How did this famously disciplined athlete, or someone onher well-paid coaching and management staffs, fail to “click on that link”? (Meldonium had also been on WADA’s monitoring list since the start of 2015.) And most important: What punishment fits this particular crime?
The ITF announced that Sharapova will begin serving a provisional suspension on March 12, with the length of the ban to be determined.
“I know with this I face consequences,” Sharapovasaid. “I don’t want to end my career this way, and I really hope I’m given another chance.”
The consensus in thepublic-relations world was that she had made a strong first step in damage control by “getting ahead of the story,” admitting a modicum of guilt, and showing contrition.
It was left to Sharapova’s lawyer, John Haggerty, to take theharder bargaining position in aninterviewwithSI.com.
“We are attempting to have a conversation with the ITF up front,” Haggerty said, “because we think there are a laundry list of extremely mitigating circumstances that once taken into consideration would result in dramatically reducing any sanction that they might want to impose on Maria.”
There’s little question that athletes in many sports have been using meldonium to increase endurance. Russian ice dancer Ekaterina Bobrova and two Ethiopian runners have also been suspended for it, and in random tests authorized by WADA last year, the Partnership for Clean Competitionfoundthat traces of meldonium showed up in 2.2 percent of athletes’ urine samples, a rate twice as high as any substance on the prohibited list.
It will be left to the ITF to determine the seriousness of Sharapova’s transgression. The fact that she took the drug for a decade before 2016 shouldn'tbe a factor. Whatever her motivations were, itwasn’t illegal; maybe meldonium should have beenbannedduring that time, but it wasn’t. Whatdoesmatter is that tennis players are responsible for whatever is found in their bodies, and that meldonium was found in Sharapova’s in 2016.
If the ITF determines that a doping violation is “intentional,”a four-year suspension is required. This means, essentially, that the player knew he or she was committing a violation, and did it anyway. If we believe Sharapova's press-conference story, that’s not what happened here. In the case of a “huge mistake” like hers, a two-year ban is mandated. After that, the player’s level of “fault or negligence” is assessed. Depending on what the ITF decides, the suspension can be cut in half, but no more. All of that taken together, Sharapova may be looking at a one-year ban.
The closest recent case to hers is one involving Marin Cilic from 2013. That spring he tested positive for a banned substance. He was initially suspended for 18 months, but had that number halved by the ITF on appeal, after successfully arguing that he had ingested the substance unknowingly in a glucose tablet, and that the drug hadn’t been active in his system during competition. That suspension was further reduced to four months by the Court of Arbitration for Sport. At the time, while I believed Cilic’s story, I thought the nine-month suspensionmade sense.
Sharapova’s failure—not clicking on a link that was sent to her; not reading a list that every player must read—is more obvious than Cilic’s. I don’t think tennis would be well served by driving her from the sport; she’ll be 29 next month, and a long ban would be a career-ender. But I also don’t think the sport would be well served by allowing her to play again in 2016;missing the Olympics in particularwill be a blow. Tennis doesn’t need to make an example of Sharapova, but it does need to show that once it has caught a star, it won’t let her get away.
a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soooo... active wta players senyapppp jek xde komen nmpk nya... sdg berdebar kott ...atp players pun sama...huhuhu... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by cyclops_psycho at 8-3-2016 10:19 PM
Mulan replied at 8-3-2016 10:10 PM
Soooo... active wta players senyapppp jek xde komen nmpk nya... sdg berdebar kott ...atp players pun ...
Yup, xde komen pun from active players..cuma ada byk tweet from Martina Navratilova and Jenn Capriati tp Jenn Capriati sgt la meroyan mcm dah lupa dia pernah kena kantoi doping! Siap kasi cadangan semua titles yg Masha dh menang ditarik balik, kepala hotak dia!! Bende ni officially illegal start from 1st Jan 2016..ada Masha menang any title ke start 1st Jan 2016?? Bongok la Jenn Cappriati, hilang respek aku dgn dia!! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yen_Aireena replied at 8-3-2016 04:29 PM
We all make mistakes Maria, but if you need a shoulder to cry on, @ashburn here for you! :lovelin ...
hehehe...
im always available 4 masha... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yen_Aireena replied at 8-3-2016 01:02 PM
alaaa nike nie..
kecohh betulll
xperr...adidas ada
hello nike..u will not find
another Maria ok... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mulan replied at 8-3-2016 07:52 PM
Tag Heuer ... Porsche ... dh ikut jejak Nike...
tag heuer bolehh blahhh...rolex ada..
porsche pon xheranlahhh..ferrari ada..
ok thenn..who else?? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Post time 8-3-2016 02:31 PM
Author
