|
[Jenayah]
SR, Wall Street Journal berterusan memfitnah Najib- PANAS! bukti dah keluar
[Copy link]
|
|
haah akann..senang je.. 3 baris line je dah tau cite macam mana.. ni tak payah nak dok pikir lama2 nak buat line nak spin cite sana sini..
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
airfilterkotor replied at 8-7-2015 01:19 PM
WSJ: Weyy... ko datang rumah aku semalam ekk?
Najib: Manade... aku tak curi laa.
Simple dan amat mudah....
Kalau tak faham2 jugak, sah2 ada DNA Wok Jowo Ahmad Maslan.... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
peguam nak rayo gak bang/dik.. ..Kena ingat 14 hari waktu kerja.. tak masuk holiday
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
la korang ni
najib dah nafikan duit masuk dalam akaun dia
kalau dituduh masuk dalam akaun sendiri, secara automatik dituduh songlap le sis
abis duit masuk akaun personal ni untuk diperam je ke dalam tu???
susah sangat ke nak kaitkan??
ke uols still nak terus dengan fantasi kununnya najib hanya nafi guna untuk personal uses, tapi tak nafikan duit masuk akaun beliau???
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kita tengok masa kes 1MDB meletop dulu tu cukuplah. Punyalah dia dok konar/nafi.Ujung ujung dah takleh konar jugak.... sebab bohong yg pertama digunapakai untuk bohong yang kedua, ketiga dan seterusnya.
Laa ni, sekali dia konar/nafi untuk first round.... ujung ujung akan jadi macam 1MDB jugak.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tang mana dia nafi...
yg dia nafi dia songlap utk diri dia
ke ko khayal najib nafi duit masuk acc dia.. berkali2 aku tgk bideo tu...
sian sungguh kat bang kem
nanti la kalau rajin aku transkrip bideo tu..
mlm ni malas.. nak lipat baju melambak
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kalau betul akaun dia takde masuk duit banyak macam tu, nafi saja laa akaun saya tidak penah menerima kemasukan duit yang banyak seperti yang dikatakan.
Ini tidak, terus cakap saya tak songlap duit tersebut.
See....
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jika berbohong untuk pertama kali dan bohong pertama tadi digunapakai untuk bohong yg kedua..... sampai masa nanti tersungkur jugak.
Pepatah melayu ada mengatakan:
Se clever-clever chipmunk jumping,
in the end fall onto the ground also.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
jangan cepat sangat buat andaian "eh dia camni camni la, mesti dia camtu camtu"
"isshhh nape dia gitu gitu, haa nampak sangat dia ehem-ehem"
sama la macam kat thread sebelah
dalam thread ni ada yang speku bangkem sebagai multinick seseorang
bila bangkem masuk kat thread sebelah, dah ada orang percaya spekulasi tu dan dengan konfiden fitnah bangkem sebagai multinick adam ke sape ntah...
napak tak camne spekulasi dan andaian boleh jadi fitnah yang diterima umum??
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
lol
abis tu dalam video tu najib tak nafikan dia songlap duit la kan??
sebab penafian (najib guna perkataan kononnya), najib guna satu lafaz je, dalam ayat yang sama, menafikan songlap dan memasukkan duit dalam akaun peribadi..
pffttgghhh
macai dah keliru...
oh ya, nanti macai putar belit lagi "haa memang la bukan najib yang masukkan duit, orang lain yang masukkan duit tu ke dalam akaun dia"
prfftgtgtgtgtgtggghhhghhghghthgthhgth
your logical fallacy is :ambiguity fallacy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orang kalau dah menggelabah, dia akan jadi macam ni.
Cikgu Disiplin Paling Garang: Oittt.... engkorang masuk tandas cikgu pompoan tadi ekk?
BBNU: Manade cikgu, ki..ki..kitaorang tak intai apa-apa pun. (gelabah punya pasal)
Cikgu Disiplin Paling Garang: .....
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
throwback... wsj
Malaysian investigators scrutinizing a controversial government investment fund have traced nearly $700 million of deposits into what investigators believe are the personal bank accounts of Malaysia’s prime minister, Najib Razak
The government probe documents what investigators believe to be the movement of cash among government agencies, banks and companies linked to 1MDB before it ended up in Mr. Najib’s personal accounts. Documents reviewed by The Wall Street Journal include bank transfer forms and flow charts put together by government investigators that reflect their understanding of the path of the cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
abis tu...
najib sendiri yg tergedik2 kata songlap2 ni... wsj tak sebut pon songlap ke hapa....
yg disebut
The government probe documents what investigators believe to be the movement of cash among government agencies, banks and companies linked to 1MDB before it ended up in Mr. Najib’s personal accounts. Documents reviewed by The Wall Street Journal include bank transfer forms and flow charts put together by government investigators that reflect their understanding of the path of the cash
adakah sbb najib klem yg masuk acc dia wang halal.. bukan wang songlap?
sbb tu dia kata dia tak songlap duit masuk acc dia?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
klau tuduh duit masuk dalam akaun personal, apa tujuan tuduhan tu??
apa maksud dakwaan tu??
kalau tira jadi najib, tira rasa apa niatnya???
boleh dik tira share your fruit of mind dengan bangkem?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
kan bangkem dah bagitau sebelum ni
najib memang taknak saman WSJ
najib nak saman SR je
padahal si buzz azam ni ada dalam frenlist bangkem dan group whatsapp bangkem yang aktif bincang pasal isu ni
biasa la, si buzz azam ni dia memang lantang sikit
semua nak dilanggarnya
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
dakwaan wsj tu berdasarkan dokumen yg wsj ada... depa dapati duit jutaan masuk dlm acc ambank personal najib..maksud dakwaan tu.. najib dah terangkan berkali2 ...
bang kem pon dah berkali2 tepek bideo najib
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gigih ciktira ni melayan badut ...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Badlisyah and all the #@ll carriers swift to spin the swift, end up slipping on a peel
This is from Malaysiakini here:
Top banker claims WSJ fell for 'fraud' bank docs
by Nigel Aw
Updated Jul 08, 2015 5:42pm
CIMB Islamic Bank chief executive officer Badlisyah Abdul Ghani has accused The Wall Street Journal of falling for false documents with regard to its report claiming that RM2.6 billion worth of 1MDB-linked funds were deposited into AmBank accounts belonging to Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak.
However, a check by Malaysiakini revealed that he could have missed the mark.
Badlisyah had based his claim on an analysis of the 'Swift' message documents released by The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) yesterday.
"Fraud using Swift message is real and it is shocking that WSJ fell for it.
"And it is even more unfortunate that some Malaysians also fell for it by relying on WSJ's good reputation," Badlisyah said in a Facebook comment.
He zoomed in on two transactions, involving RM2,366,731,268.8 (US$619,999,988) and RM232,855,777.08 (US$60,999,988,), said to be from Tanore Finance through Wells Fargo Bank to accounts allegedly controlled by Najib.
He took issue with what he claimed to be discrepancy in the sender's address as well as the Swift Code of the bank in which the funds were sent from.
He pointed out the document listed the bank's address as "375 Park Avenue, NY 4080, New York, NY" but the "real address" of the particular Wells Fargo bank branch is "375 Park Avenue, 10th floor, New York, NY 10152".
"Please note postcode is very different - 10152 vs 4080.
"This is typically one way how one could check the authenticity of a Swift message.
The tell tale sign includes wrong name of banks and/or wrong address.
"Fraudsters will always make at minimum a slightly different name or address so that people would miss it upon first scrutiny," he said.
'Discrepancy in Swift Code'
Furthermore, Badlisyah said, the Swift Code for the particular Wells Fargo Bank branch is "PNBPUS3NNYC" but the document released by WSJ stated it as "PNBUS3NANYC".
"The best and most straightforward way to check whether a Swift document is authentic is to check the Swift Code of the bank used in the document.
"If it is wrong then the whole thing is a fraud. This can also be done online, through the relevant official website.
"The Swift Code PNBPUS3NANYC belongs to Alfa-Bank Moscow. This is not just a tell tale sign the document is an absolute hoax but a very firm confirmation that the document is a hoax or a fraud.
"How could WSJ miss this factual error?" he said in the Facebook posting.
Malaysiakini has scrutinised Badlisyah's claim and found no discrepancy in the address' postcode.
Both "4080" and "10152" are part of the Bank's address and is listed as follows: "375 Park Avenue NY 4080. New York, NY 10152".
This was confirmed by two Swift Code databases (photo), bank-codes.com and swift.com,which list the address as "375 Park Avenue, NY 4080" followed by postal code as "New York, NY 10152".
Furthermore, Malaysiakini also found that Badlisyah had erroneously attributed the Swift Code PNBPUS3NANYC as belonging to Alfa-Bank Moscow.
Alfa-Bank on its official website lists its Swift Code as ALFARUMM and this is also confirmed by databases such as swift-code.com
My comments : So the CEO of a bank here thought he had caught out the Wall Street Journal. It looks like a reporter writing for Malaysiakini has caught out the Bank CEO.
Here is something a friend of mine sent me about Swift codes :
This guy (referring someone else) is just creating confusion.Swift codes are written as such:
AAAA BB CC DDD
AAAA refers to the bank
BB refers to the country
CC refers to location
DDD is the branch code. DDD is optional. I usually just put XXX when i do transfer.
When i transfer to my maybank acc, i just use MBBE MY KL XXX
So even the KL can change...
All that matters is that for wells fargo, it is
PNBP US
The rest can change...u check all this on www.swift-code.com
Maybe Badlisyah should check out the Swift codes.
This whole damn thing is a product of a systemic breakdown in our education system, the product of a really inadequate corporate fraternity, a non existent value system among our entire 'establishment crowd' (except maybe Nazir Razak and gang).
It is really presumptious to think that the Wall Street Journal would be conned by a wrong address or an altered Swift code.
I will also be commenting on that statement by Hafarizam Wan later. Also amateurish. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|