|
|
[Jenayah]
SR, Wall Street Journal berterusan memfitnah Najib- PANAS! bukti dah keluar
[Copy link]
|
|
|
atira replied at 10-7-2015 12:32 AM
Isu 1MDB: 'Jangan dengar cerita karut, kebenaran akan muncul juga' - Najib
Bernama | Kemas kini: Ju ...
Ada possible tak ketua audit negara ni dh disuap awal2? Sbb jibby mcm yakin je x brsalah. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
atira replied at 10-7-2015 04:58 AM
jepon ni ckp pasal apa @Kittie ??
Oh, nih artikel 2 hari lps kat paper Asahi.
http://www.asahi.com/articles/DA3S11846737.html
Derang ckp yg pasal duit masuk personal akaun Najib tu. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tuduhan ke atas Anwar lagi aku kira mengarut.... takat tuduhan ke atas Najib ni mcm budaya biasa je ni... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
atira replied at 10-7-2015 04:58 AM
jepon ni ckp pasal apa @Kittie ??
Tag lah mamat yang kononnya jual proton dekat jepun tu
@peYno |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
diorang ni... nak kene saman dgn bijan syumul ka??
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tunggu loyar bijan hantar surat mintak clarification...
mintak lah tolong sesiapa tulis dalam bahasa Jepun yang sempurna..
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
minta tolong @peYno bak kat @PenyokongNajib
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Masa aku kat jepun dulu japanese memang suka tun M.. atuk2 jepun puji malaysia terer bola dulu2..sekarang salah laku najib pulak masuk paper sana..aiyo... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Upkan benang, semoga bijan mendapat cash di bulan remdan ini  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Najib: Jangan dengar dakwaan karut Internet
9:59PM - 9 Jul 2015
http://www.malaysiakini.com/news/304645
Perdana Menteri Datuk Seri Najib Razak hari ini meminta orang awam supaya tidak percaya dakwaan terhadapnya dan keluarganya di media sosial.
Berucap dalam sebuah masjid di Kuala Lumpur malam ini, Najib berkata terdapat banyak perkara mengarut di Internet yang tidak harus dilayan.
“Kita akan pastikan kebenaran muncul juga akhirnya,” katanya kepada orang ramai yang terdiri daripada orang awam dan pegawai kerajaan di Masjid Salahuddin Al Ayubi Mosque, Taman Melati.
Sebelum ini, laporan Wall Street Journal mendakwa bahawa AS$700 juta (RM 2.6 bilion) telah didepositkan ke dalam akaun bank peribadi Najib.
1MDB pula kini sedang disiasat oleh Jabatan Audit Negara dan Jawatankuasa Kira-Kira Wang Negara (PAC).
Terdapat juga siasatan oleh pasukan petugas pelbagai agensi yang terdiri daripada polis, Suruhanjaya Pencegahan Rasuah Malaysia, Bank Negara, dan Pejabat Peguam Negara.
Selain itu, laman web pemberi maklumat Sarawak Report hari ini mendakwa RM2 juta telah didepositkan ke dalam akaun bank yang didakwa milik isteri Najib, Datin Seri Rosmah Mansor.
Laman web itu berkata ia berdasarkan maklumat yang diterima berkaitan dengan satu akaun di Affin Bank Berhad.
Najib tidak bercakap mengenai dakwaan itu tetapi meminta semua pihak supaya menunggu laporan Ketua Audit Negara untuk menjelaskan perkara itu.
"Jika anda berkata berbilion dana yang dimiliki 1MDB hilang, tunggu dan dengar laporan Ketua Audit Negara, sama ada ia benar atau tidak," tegasnya.
Najib berkata beliau tidak akan membuat sebarang pengumuman mengenai dakwaan terhadapnya dan membiarkan Tan Sri Ambrin Buang (Ketua Audit Negara) melaporkan perkara itu. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Akaun Jho Low di Singapura diteliti dalam siasatan 1MDB, kata WSJ
Published: 10 July 2015 9:12 AM
http://www.themalaysianinsider.c ... b-siasatan-kata-wsj
The Wall Street Journal mendakwa ahli perniagaan Low Taek Jho mendepositkan RM2 bilion ke dalam akaun bank Singapura. – Gambar wsj.com, 10 Julai, 2015.
Akaun ahli perniagaan Low Taek Jho kini di bawah penelitian berikutan siasatan yang dijalankan terhadap dakwaan berbilion ringgit dana 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB) dipindahkan ke akaun peribadi Perdana Menteri Datuk Seri Najib Razak.
Menurut laporan oleh The Wall Street Journal (WSJ), polis Singapura dan Bank Negara membincangkan AS$529 juta (RM2 bilion) dalam akaun milik Low, juga dikenali sebagai Jho Low, selepas Bank Negara Malaysia pada Mac meminta bantuan Singapura menyiasat 1MDB.
Memetik surat bertarikh 13 Mac daripada Pejabat Laporan Transaksi Mencurigakan Singapura kepada Bank Negara Malaysia, WSJ berkata, wang itu didepositkan ke dalam akaun bank perniagaan Singapura di BSI SA, yang dikawal Low antara 2011 dan 2013.
ejabat Laporan Transaksi Mencurigakan berkata, wang itu didepositkan daripada akaun bank Switzerland syarikat dikenal pasti sebagai Good Star Ltd, walaupun ia tidak dinyatakan di mana ia mendapat dana atau apa yang berlaku kepada wang itu. Akaun berkenaan dilaporkan ditutup pada Februari lepas.
"Jika terdapat unsur jenayah dipindahkan ke Singapura, kami ingin menentukan sama ada suatu kesalahan dilakukan di Singapura," kata Ketua Pejabat Laporan Transaksi Mencurigakan,Chua Jia Leng dipetik sebagai berkata dalam surat itu. Putrajaya berkata, awal tahun ini 1MDB mempunyai AS$1.1 bilion dalam akaun BSI di Singapura, walaupun tidak diketahui sama ada ia mempunyai kaitan dan Low.
Low berkata, peranannya dalam 1MDB adalah sebagai "penasihat sekali-sekala". 1MDB menjadi perhatian umum selepas WSJ melaporkan AS$700 juta (RM2.67 bilion) bergerak di kalangan agensi kerajaan, bank-bank dan entiti dikaitkan dengan 1MDB sebelum berakhir di akaun peribadi perdana menteri dengan 5 deposit berasingan.
Berikutan itu, satu pasukan petugas khas terdiri daripada Jabatan Peguam Negara, polis, pihak berkuasa anti-rasuah dan Bank Negara memulakan siasatan ke atas 1MDB.
Najib menafikan mengambil dana untuk kepentingan peribadi, tetapi sebagai menteri kewangan dan pengerusi lembaga penasihat 1MDB, beliau berada di bawah penelitian ke atas urusan meragukan firma milik kerajaan itu dan RM42 bilion hutang yang ditanggung dalam masa 6 tahun operasi.
Pada Rabu, pasukan petugas khas membekukan 6 akaun sebagai sebahagian daripada siasatan dan merampas dokumen-dokumen berkaitan dengan 17 akaun bank. Ia tidak menyatakan akaun mana yang terbabit.
Najib menuduh WSJ mempunyai "niat jahat" dan menjadi sebahagian daripada plot untuk menjatuhkan beliau. Peguamnya juga meminta “penjelasan” WSJ berhubung fakta-fakta dalam laporan itu. – 10 Julai, 2015.
|
This post contains more resources
You have to Login for download or view attachment(s). No Account? Register
x
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SATU DUNIA..semua paper bercakap yer hehe atlast popular juga dia akhirnyer......... satu dunia notis him now..... dan akan ingat skandal ni sampai bila bila 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by EJALTI at 10-7-2015 02:28 AM
PM not answering the cardinal question
9:00AM Jul 10, 2015
http://www.malaysiakini.com/news/304664
YOURSAY ‘Which part of the question that he did not understand?’
PM says again, no money used for personal gain
Odin Tajué: The now well-known exposé by The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) was published on July 3. The implication of the exposé is so serious, so damning that were he innocent of the allegation, he would have, within at most 48 hours, instructed his lawyers to sue the journal for defamation.
Anyone in his position would not even demand a retraction and an apology published on the front page but initiate legal action immediately. A week has gone by, but he has not done so.
Instead, we hear of his lawyers asking WSJ for its position on the allegation. Why does he/do they need that? The message or information imparted through the exposé is clearer than daylight.
The exposé was written not in bombastic or highfalutin English but in a level anyone with at least 12 or 13 years of schooling would understand.
We note that PM Najib Razak has been playing with semantics to evade the question of whether he has taken the money. Here are two quotes of his:
"I have never taken funds for personal gain as alleged by my political opponents - whether from 1MDB, SRC International or other entities, as these companies have confirmed" and "I would like to stress again that I had never taken 1MDB's funds for my personal interest."
Let us tackle the easiest matter first. The confirmation from 1MDB and SRC International are worthless. What we have heard from 1MDB chief Arul Kanda Kandasamy and Second Finance Minister Ahmad Husni Hanadzlah is more than sufficient to tell us that their statements are as worthless as monopoly money.
In both his quotes, what he has implied is that he did take the money, that the only thing he did not do was to use the money for his personal gain/interest. Of course, we all know that implication.
We are not as stupid as he seems to think we are. What constitutes or what he meant by personal gain/interest is of no import, as neither one serves to assoil or absolve him of the serious offence. But let us take a look at it, anyway.
If he did use some of the money to finance the Umno-BN campaign pre-GE13, and/or to induce voters to vote for the coalition by offering them incentives to do so, then the expending of that portion was for his personal gain because had the Umno-BN won, he would remain prime minister.
Continuing to occupy that position would be his personal gain. Similarly, if he had dished out the money to sundry people or entities, the reason for the giving must be anticipation of reciprocal support - which, again, would be his personal gain. Remember his ‘gua tolong lu, lu tolong gua' (I help you, you help me)?
Existential Turd: Indeed, Najib is not categorically denying that huge sums of money were deposited into his bank account. He is denying that he used the money for his personal gain. This non-denial is as good as admitting his did receive huge sums of money.
What he means by "not for his personal gain" is up to his interpretation. So exactly for what purpose did he use the money for? Even if he did not gain directly, did he gain indirectly?
Commentable: The WSJ allegation is made with malicious intent? What malicious intent?
Najib, if the humongous sum of monies was transferred into your accounts, then you are really asking for it and in fact, you deserved it.
Of all people, you ought to know how sensitive global leaders are with regards to illegal transfers and money laundering, especially nowadays when some of the world leading nations are victim to the IS (Islamic State) terrorism.
They don't care whether nations such as Malaysia project itself as a moderate Muslim country. If you move money around suspiciously, you are bound to be rooted out. Think, of all PMs and presidents in this world, why pick you?
Why WSJ has to harbour malice against you? What for?
KayL: According to AmBank founder Hussain Ahmad Najadi's son Pascal, "Dad then spoke about massive corruption. He also said that they [people in power] had lost the plot in the sense that they recklessly and behind their own population’s backs raked in billions of ringgit from construction, oil and gas to defence and transportation. He made a point that it’s insane that they do not for one second think about the future generations, simply not."
All the cronies have really sunk deep into the cesspool. Some cronies are already claiming to be neutral in case Umno sinks. But back when Umno was strong, they lap up all the privileges and kickbacks that come with it.
Malaysia has truly disgusting people in charge, the lot of them, and I hope they all go up in flames together.
Np: Imagine a person who worked for a company and he used his position as the managing director to transfer company's monies to his personal bank account.
When he was caught by the shareholders, he justified his actions by telling the shareholders that his aim was to use the monies for the well-being of the company.
Such a case would immediately be considered as embezzlement of company's funds.
Anonymous 759201436321741: Here is the bone contention. The issue here is that the PM is not denying the money was credited into his personal accounts, but that he did not profit from it (personal gain).
If you study all his statements, he never denied the existence of the money, only strenuously denying that he profited from it personally.
But WSJ never accused him of profiting from it (use the money personally) only asserting the money went into his personal accounts. How to sue WSJ for something they did not say or even suggest?
Cmfoo: Najib, we say again - it's not about 'personal gain'. That's not what WSJ reported but that the funds flow into your personal accounts with your name on it.
You can easily and say it outright that this isn't true. Why skirt the issue and avoid answering the basic question that everyone is waiting for?
Swipenter: Najib, was the money deposited in your private accounts and why? Whether you used the money for personal gain is chapter two of the saga.
Chapter three is what was the money used for? Chapter four is who benefitted from the money? And the prologue is how the money was obtained by SRC and Tanore Finance. We already guessed it came from 1MDB.
Kingfisher: The PM is answering the second question but not the cardinal question as to whether public money was received in his personal accounts as reported by the WSJ.
There will be no need to answer the second question now as it is purely academic at this stage. He will have much to answer later. For now, answer the first question.
Thisia: Which part of the question that he did not understand? Was the RM2.6 billion transferred to your personal bank accounts? Yes or no?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The above is a selection of comments posted by Malaysiakini subscribers. Only paying subscribers can post comments. Over the past one year, Malaysiakinians have posted over 100,000 comments. Join the Malaysiakini community and help set the news agenda. Subscribe now.
These comments are compiled to reflect the views of Malaysiakini subscribers on matters of public interest. Malaysiakini does not intend to represent these views as fact. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1MDB will continue to cooperate with A-G
9 JULY 2015 @ 7:29 PM
KUALA LUMPUR: 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB) will immediately contact the National Audit Department to seek clarity on which documents that were needed and had yet to be submitted by the strategic development company.
In a statement today, 1MDB President and Group Executive Director Arul Kanda said: “1MDB refers to media reports today quoting the Public Accounts Committee (PAC Chairman), who confirmed that nothing suspicious had been discovered in the interim investigation by the Auditor-General.
"We note in particular, the PAC Chairman’s comments on the thoroughness of the AG's investigation, which included inspecting documents obtained from 1MDB and other parties.
“1MDB confirms that all documents in its possession have been submitted to the National Audit Department. As the interim report has not yet been shared with 1MDB, we are unable to comment on the PAC Chairman’s statement that certain documents appear to have not been submitted.
“As requested by the PAC Chairman, we will immediately contact the National Audit Department to seek clarity on which documents the PAC Chairman is referring to. “1MDB reiterates our commitment to fully cooperate with the Auditor-General and all lawful authorities that are currently investigating 1MDB".
http://www.nst.com.my/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
lalalallala....
Jho Low’s account in Singapore scrutinised in 1MDB probe, says WSJ
Published: 10 July 2015 8:51 AM
Businessman Low Taek Jho’s accounts have come under scrutiny amid an ongoing probe into allegations that billions of ringgit from 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB) were transferred into Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak’s personal accounts.
According to a report by The Wall Street Journal (WSJ), Singaporean police and Bank Negara had discussed some RM2,014.41 (US$529) million (RM2 billion) in accounts belonging to Low, also known as Jho Low, after the central bank in March asked for Singapore’s help investigating 1MDB.
Citing a letter dated March 13 from Singapore’s Suspicious Transaction Reporting Office to Bank Negara, WSJ said the money was deposited into a Singaporean business bank account at BSI SA, controlled by Low between 2011 and 2013.
The Suspicious Transaction Reporting Office said the money had been deposited from the Swiss bank account of a company called Good Star Ltd, although it was not stated where Good Star had obtained the funds or what happened to the money. The account was reportedly closed last February.
“If proceeds of crime have been transferred to Singapore, we would like to consider whether an offence has been committed in Singapore,” Suspicious Transaction Reporting head Chua Jia Leng was quoted as saying in the letter.
Putrajaya said earlier this year 1MDB had RM4.19 (US$1.1) billion in a BSI account in Singapore, although it is not known whether a connection exists between that account and Low.
Low has said that his role at 1MDB is that of an “occasional adviser”.
1MDB came under the spotlight after WSJ reported that RM2,665.58 (US$700) million had been moved among government agencies, banks and entities linked to 1MDB before finally ending up in the prime minister's personal accounts in five separate deposits.
The allegation is being investigated by a special task force made up of Attorney-General Tan Sri Abdul Gani Patail, Inspector-General of Police Tan Sri Khalid Abu Bakar, Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) chairman Tan Sri Abu Kassim Mohamed and Bank Negara governor Tan Sri Zeti Akhtar Aziz.
Najib has denied taking funds for personal gain, but as finance minister and chairman of 1MDB's advisory board, he is under scrutiny over the government-owned firm's opaque dealings and RM42 billion debt incurred in just six years of operations.
As of Wednesday, the special task force had frozen six accounts as part of its probe and seized documents related to 17 bank accounts. It has not said whose accounts were affected.
Najib has accused WSJ of having “malicious intent” and of being part of a plot to bring him down. His lawyers have also asked WSJ for “clarification” of the facts in its report. – July 10, 2015. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sumber: Pasukan Audit dapati pengarah 1MDB tidak dibawa berunding
10:19AM - 10 Jul 2015
http://www.malaysiakini.com/news/304671
Siasatan Jabatan Audit Negara ke atas 1MDB mendapati banyak keputusan pelaburan syarikat itu telah dibuat tanpa kelulusan lembaga pengarah terlebih dahulu.
Keputusan-keputusan itu dibuat melalui resolusi bertulis, dan bukan dengan mengadakan mesyuarat lembaga pengarah, kata satu sumber yang mempunyai pengetahuan mengenai laporan interim jabatan tersebut.
"Pasukan audit menyifatkan ia seolah-olah lembaga itu telah diketepikan atau keputusan dipengaruhi oleh orang lain," katanya lagi.
Perdana Menteri Datuk Seri Najib Abdul Razak yang sedang berdepan dengan kritikan kerana peranannya dalam syarikat milik kerajaan, 1MDB, bukan ahli lembaga pengarahnya, tetapi sebaliknya menjadi pengerusi lembaga penasihatnya.
Pasukan audit juga mendapati bahawa dalam banyak hal, pihak pengurusan syarikat itu telah gagal untuk mematuhi arahan dari lembaga pengarah.
"Mereka juga mendakwa bahawa terdapat keadaan di mana lembaga pengarah diberi maklumat yang tidak tepat atau tidak lengkap mengenai keputusan pelaburan," kata sumber itu.
Sumber itu berkata, pasukan audit juga mendapati syarikat itu tidak mempunyai jawatankuasa pelaburan untuk memastikan kewajaran sebelum membuat pelaburan.
Proses-proses ini, kata sumber itu, menyebabkan struktur pengurusannya lemah.
Menurut sumber itu, pasukan audit memetik usaha sama 1MDB dengan PetroSaudi International Ltd (PSI) sebagai contoh. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bagus jika benar siasatan kini menjurus kepada
si gemuk Jho Bow
ciri2 muka tipikal cina komunis
DAP nya jelas banyak unsur
tak boleh dipercayai |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Perkasa ulang pendirian DAP gesa tubuh RCI siasat 1MDB
Published: 10 July 2015 11:03 AM
http://www.themalaysianinsider.c ... buh-rci-siasat-1mdb
Pertubuhan pendesak kerajaan, Pertubuhan Peribumi Perkasa Malaysia (Perkasa) mendesak agar satu Suruhanjaya Siasatan Diraja (RCI) dibentuk bagi menyiasat dana sarat hutang 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB).
Gesaan sama yang dibuat DAP pada awal Mac lalu, dibuat Setiausaha Biro Pemantauan dan Integriti Perkasa, Azrul Akmal Saharudin selepas 4 bulan, dalam satu kenyataan, pagi ini.
"Biro bertegas mengulangi desakan kita sebelum ini agar sebuah suruhanjaya diraja dibentuk di mana ia mempunyai kuasa bermandat untuk menyiasat mana-mana pihak tanpa kompromi supaya tidak ada lagi keraguan di mata rakyat selepas keputusan siasatan diumumkan," kenyataannya dipetik.
Gesaan itu dibuat Azrul selepas 1MDB didakwa tidak memberikan kerjasama sepenuhnya dalam memberikan segala dokumen yang diperlukan dalam siasatan yang dijalankan Jabatan Audit Negara.
Ketua Parlimen DAP Lim Kit Siang pada 1 Mac lalu berkata Kabinet mesti menjadikan 1MDB agenda mutlaknya dan memutuskan satu RCI dibentuk mengenai firma yang bermasalah itu, susulan pendedahan yang syarikat milik ahli perniagaan Low Taek Jho didakwa melarikan AS$700 juta darinya.
Menurut Lim, kegagalan Perdana Menteri Datuk Seri Najib Razak menyelesaikan skandal sekitar dana pelaburan strategik negara yang dibebani hutang itu boleh membawa kepada penyingkirannya.
"Najib tidak boleh terus mengelak isu itu dan saya menyeru beliau menubuhkan Suruhanjaya Siasatan Diraja bagi skandal RM42 bilion 1MDB ini, khususnya berhubung pendedahan Sarawak Report yang ia memperoleh akses kepada beribu-ribu dokumen dan e-mel yang berkaitan dengan transaksi 1MDB.
"Sekiranya skandal RM42 bilion 1MDB itu tidak ditangani dengan cara yang bertanggungjawab dan memuaskan, kita mungkin menyaksikan buat pertama kalinya di Malaysia seorang perdana menteri meletak jawatan atau disingkirkan akibat satu skandal kewangan," kata Lim dalam satu kenyataan pada 1 Mac lalu. – 10 Julai, 2015.
|
This post contains more resources
You have to Login for download or view attachment(s). No Account? Register
x
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PC yg diorg rampas semlm dlm the star tu PC zaman bila wei.. agak2la klu nak nipu.. org dh tak pakai dh pc tu.. drama ni semua.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Post time 10-7-2015 05:19 AM
Author
