|
[Dunia]
V26 MH370 Usaha Mencari Kotak Hitam Diteruskan
[Copy link]
|
|
ida88 posted on 8-4-2014 11:00 AM
Saye lagi bertambah hairan pasal standby passenger tu
Supposed ade lebeh sit lagi kan
Bukan nye ...
miahahhaha
i x saba tunggu press conference
mesti nnt ada jawapan pasal persoalan kita ni..
maksudnya x payah nak standby sgt.. ada banyak seat kosong.. stakat nk accomodate lg 5 org tu kan.....
go show sgt..
klu open tix then penerangan page belakang2 tu adalah salah.... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
scorpionkiki posted on 8-4-2014 07:02 PM
skrg I pun sudah fening... ker teori yg pernah kita bincang yg pasal dca dan igp tu mmg boleh pak ...
mind boggling smuanye
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The mystery behind the four passengers who checked in but did not board the Malaysia Airlines (MAS) flight MH 370 was finally “cleared” after it was revealed that four standby passengers had taken their seats.
Following a barrage of questions on the matter, MAS group chief executive officer Ahmad Jauhari Yahya said of the 227 passengers, four who had bought tickets did not turn up to catch the flight to Beijing at the Kuala Lumpur International Airport (KLIA).
Their places were taken by four people, who were standby passengers, he explained.
He, however did not reveal more about the four passengers.
It was earlier reported that five people did not board the plane after checking in but yesterday, Inspector-General of Police Tan Sri Khalid Abu Bakar told reporters that every person who had booked a ticket for the flight had boarded the plane.
He maintained that that is what the police found in their investigations.
"Let me make it simple, everyone who was supposed to be onboard, was on the flight," Khalid was quoted as saying yesterday.
Khalid's statement caused confusion as the Department of Civil Aviation (DCA) had earlier claimed that four passengers did not get on the plane.
DCA director-general Datuk Azharuddin Abdul Rahman told reporters that the five had failed to board and their bags were all removed from the plane, as per the SOP, before take-off. Last edited by lorelai on 8-4-2014 11:16 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
dopey posted on 8-4-2014 07:05 PM
ey..245..+2crew seats
I gugel je
Kne tanye @kelana36
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Perhaps in "making it simple", he oversimplified, and created more confusion. Why were there standby passengers if there were 55 empty seats? Were they simply upgrade standby passengers who would have boarded anyway? (This seems fairly likely, as one of the passengers who claimed to have missed the flight is CEO Kaiden Dawson, and CEO's generally go business class)
Or was there some other reason why 55 seats were empty, such as for weight reasons?
There has been some speculation that there was a heavy cargo that limited to the number of passengers. Anyone heard of anything like that?-- mr google
Last edited by lorelai on 8-4-2014 11:22 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ida88 posted on 8-4-2014 07:18 PM
Banyak sangat teori
yg mane satu ek?
Teori pasal dca chief tak reti temberang sbb job spect dia... sbb tu dia bg honest answer manakala igp pulak...ehem ehem
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
scorpionkiki posted on 8-4-2014 11:02 AM
skrg I pun sudah fening... ker teori yg pernah kita bincang yg pasal dca dan igp tu mmg boleh pak ...
i rasa tu lg layak teori tu.. hihi
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
lorelai posted on 8-4-2014 07:18 PM
Perhaps in "making it simple", he oversimplified, and created more confusion. Why were there standby ...
245 minus 229=?why 55?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oh ya ..forgot abt the other biznez class yaa...blur today |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
sampai skrg kes 5 penumpang tu mcm vague sgt kan
masih confuse di situ
tapi nape tak da dah wartawan yg bertanya?
tapi boleh agak
kalau ada yg btanya
jawapanya 'telah direrangkan pd PC yg awal' |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ida88 posted on 8-4-2014 07:17 PM
I gugel je
Kne tanye @kelana36
Mana kapten @kelana36 ye? Lama x nmpk..aku suka baca penerangan2 dari beliau sbb ni mmg bidang dia..
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
dopey posted on 8-4-2014 11:26 AM
245 minus 229=?why 55?
ooo sbb ikot kiraan yg 282 tu
tolak tolak jadiklaa 53
bukan 55
anyway tu bukan i yg tulis dopey..tu kestien penduduk internet
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
lorelai posted on 8-4-2014 07:18 PM
Perhaps in "making it simple", he oversimplified, and created more confusion. Why were there standby ...
4ton mangosteens...bnyk ke tu tarok dlm cargo
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
dopey posted on 8-4-2014 11:33 AM
4ton mangosteens...bnyk ke tu tarok dlm cargo
manggis jangan sesekali disebut ye disini
manggis amat powerful
dia boleh menimbulkan kegusaran banyak pihak
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ooops apa code nk kasik kt sini ttg tu ..sbab ttg tu barangkali wat cargo weight heavy so penumpang kna mch less..ratio la ktakn |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
lorelai posted on 8-4-2014 07:34 PM
manggis jangan sesekali disebut ye disini
manggis amat powerful
dia boleh menimbulkan kegusaran ...
manggis dan jumlah penumpang... . Skrg I tengok pokok manggis automatically teringat Mh370
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Entah entah business seat full
Dan standyby tu nak business seat aja |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
scorpionkiki posted on 8-4-2014 11:56 AM
manggis dan jumlah penumpang... . Skrg I tengok pokok manggis automatically teringat Mh370
heheheh..
i angguk2
takotnyeeee anti2 manggis hadir
jadi cmne ni. mana fa utk leraikan kusut ini |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Knights posted on 8-4-2014 08:00 PM
Entah entah business seat full
Dan standyby tu nak business seat aja
very possible....agree sgt...tdi duk mikir camane standby..pdahal bnyk seats not taken.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|