|
|
apa yg anda lihat belum tentu ada di depan mata anda
[Copy link]
|
|
|
menariksss............  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Takut plak aku tgk gambo pompuan tu lama2...  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wahh ni mcm pembaris yg ada ilusi tindih2 tu kan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is interesting..did some google-ing...and found this explanation...
Hybrid image
This image was made by taking an angry male face and a neutral female face, and filtering them both twice, once so as to remove the low spatial frequencies (the broad regions of light and dark you see if you scrunch your eyes up) and once so as to remove the high spatial frequencies (the details that you can only see up close). The left-hand image is a composite of the low spatial frequencies (SFs) from the woman’s face, and the high-SFs from the man’s, whereas for the right-hand image, it’s the other way round.
Up close, the high SFs dominate, and the left-hand image looks nasty. When you move further away, you can’t see the high SFs, because your visual system can’t see fine detail from that distance. So, you lose the monstrous high SFs in the left-hand image, making it look normal.
Conversely in the right-hand image, you lose the high SFs depicting the female face, and all you are left with is a blurred image of an angry male face |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Much simpler explanation....
As optical illusions go, we think this is pretty impressive. A short explanation goes something like this. When we look at an object, we can normally see both fine detail and coarse detail. However when we are close, the fine detail will dominate, and when we are further away, we lose the fine detail, and see more of the coarse detail.
Both of the faces you see above are hybrids – each face is actually a combination of two faces. The left hand face shows an angry man in fine detail, but within the picture there is also coarse detail of the calm face. Move away, and you lose the fine (angry) detail, and just see the coarse (calm) detail.
The right hand face shows the calm face in fine detail, and the angry face in coarse detail. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A hybrid image constructed from low-frequency components of a photograph of Marilyn Monroe (left inset) and high-frequency components of a photograph of Albert Einstein (right inset) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
betukar....betukar....betukar....  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
supernaturalee posted on 15-10-2012 04:48 PM 
how did it happen?goshhh
Die letak bayang2 marah kt muka tu, kalau dok jejauh nmpk la marah.
Sbb jauh2 mate dah blur xley focus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
kivio posted on 19-10-2012 12:45 AM
Die letak bayang2 marah kt muka tu, kalau dok jejauh nmpk la marah.
Sbb jauh2 mate dah blur xley ...
maybe...pastu gamba ni sbnrnya bertindih kan...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
supernaturalee posted on 22-10-2012 01:40 PM
maybe...pastu gamba ni sbnrnya bertindih kan...
fkos la dear....
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
sebab tulah yea...ada org cakap "ehh...nampak dari jauh lawa....sekali bila tgk dari dekat!" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Post time 16-10-2012 06:52 PM
