Teori Darwin: benar atau karut?

jualbukus

Asim Khan: What this short video shows us is that those people who try and rubbish perfectly warranted beliefs such as that in a Creator, because of an alleged lack of directly observable empirical evidence, are not holding up the same standard to verify their own position as atheists or evolutionists. These scientists or students of science in the video quickly shrug off the idea that they don't believe in God because they’d "rather use their minds" but the reality is that their belief in evolution is not based on the same type of empirical evidence but rather rational deduction through analysis of various observations.

Acong

teori darwin nie karut..... tipu org zaman dulu boleh laa   

Acong

ikan nie tak berevolusi

ahmeduk88

Kena ambil theory ini with a pinch of salt. Sebab evolution ni bukan theory yang baru. By baru, I mean dari Darwin. Sebab the idea (theory means that the explaination or idea dah diteliti dengan pemerhatian yang persis dan menerangkan idea tersebut).

Kalau kita turuti sejarah, ada cendekiawan islam yang berada di dalam Baitul Hikmah dulu (ni zaman khalifah abbasiah yang mana khalifahnya bernama al-ma'mun), ada seorang bernama Abu Uthman Al-Jahith. Dia ni menulis buku Kitab al-Haiwan (book of animals or buku haiwan). Di sini, apa yang menariknya, dia menentang Aristotle yang menulis History of Animals, dengan mengatakan bahawa haiwan bukannya berubah mengikut persekitarannya, tetapi dia menulis bahawa haiwan seperti anjing, musang dan serigala ini ada satu "ancestor' yang sama. Dan idea ini dibawa juga oleh Jean-Baptiste Lamarck pada kurun ke 18 dan kemudiannya disambung oleh darwin.

Untuk mengatakan bahawa manusia berevolusi dari ape pula, bagi saya, mungkin secara physiologi ada kesamaan. Tapi apa yang membezakan kita adalah free will, akal kita. Mungkin disitu, bagi saya, adalah titik bukti campurtangan agung, Allah, menghantar manusia ke bumi. Adakah secara total (body and mind) atau hanya download software, Wallahu alam.

mamarock

Pendapat mama berkenaan Teori Darwin ini adalah berdasarkan pemerhatian Darwin semata-mata dan ianya tak salah. Perbandingan dibuat diantara Chimpanzee & manusia, betul & hampir-hampir sama. Direkod & fakta ini diterima pada waktu itu w/pun sekadar hipotesis sahaja sehinggalah penemuan baru di dalam bidang genetik selepas itu oleh Gregor Mendel membuktikan isu natural selection ini.

Cthnya pelbagai kajian genetic drp dulu sehingga sekarang. Mama kasi antara cthnya di sini.

http://www.nature.com/nature/jou ... bs/nature04072.html


Secara peribadi Mama kagum dengan kepakaran pemerhatian (scientific obsevation) yg ada pada Darwin dlm waktu ketiadaan teknologi waktu tersebut.

Jika beliau seorang Islam, berpandukan Al-Quran, pasti dia akan sedar yang kumpulan chimpanzee ini asalnya ialah manusia tetapi disumpah menjadi sedemikian rupa. Patutlah hampir sama kan?

Yg pasti, non-muslim tak akan terima fakta ini..atau mungkin ada juga yang boleh menerimanya.

Buktinya hingga kini, setelah sekian lama manusia tak pernah berevolusi menjadi kumpulan monyet.

Redempire

Ini teori yg salah n xboleh dipakai....


http://toppikmalaysia.com/category/news/

God_Eater_8

not just a theory . com

You've been told that "evolution is just a theory", a guess, a hunch, and not a fact, not proven. You've been misled. Keep reading, and in less than two minutes from now you'll know that you've been misinformed. We're not going to try and change your mind about evolution. We just want to point out that "it's just a theory" is not a valid argument.

The Theory of Evolution is a theory, but guess what? When scientists use the word theory, it has a different meaning to normal everyday use.1 That's right, it all comes down to the multiple meanings of the word theory. If you said to a scientist that you didn't believe in evolution because it was "just a theory", they'd probably be a bit puzzled.

In everyday use, theory means a guess or a hunch, something that maybe needs proof. In science, a theory is not a guess, not a hunch. It's a well-substantiated, well-supported, well-documented explanation for our observations.2 It ties together all the facts about something, providing an explanation that fits all the observations and can be used to make predictions. In science, theory is the ultimate goal, the explanation. It's as close to proven as anything in science can be.

Some people think that in science, you have a theory, and once it's proven, it becomes a law. That's not how it works. In science, we collect facts, or observations, we use laws to describe them, and a theory to explain them. You don't promote a theory to a law by proving it. A theory never becomes a law.

This bears repeating. A theory never becomes a law. In fact, if there was a hierarchy of science, theories would be higher than laws. There is nothing higher, or better, than a theory. Laws describe things, theories explain them. An example will help you to understand this. There's a law of gravity, which is the description of gravity. It basically says that if you let go of something it'll fall. It doesn't say why. Then there's the theory of gravity, which is an attempt to explain why. Actually, Newton's Theory of Gravity did a pretty good job, but Einstein's Theory of Relativity does a better job of explaining it. These explanations are called theories, and will always be theories. They can't be changed into laws, because laws are different things. Laws describe, and theories explain.

Just because it's called a theory of gravity, doesn't mean that it's just a guess. It's been tested. All our observations are supported by it, as well as its predictions that we've tested. Also, gravity is real! You can observe it for yourself. Just because it's real doesn't mean that the explanation is a law. The explanation, in scientific terms, is called a theory.

Evolution is the same. There's the fact of evolution. Evolution (genetic change over generations)3 happens, just like gravity does. Don't take my word for it.4 Ask your science teacher, or google it. But that's not the issue we are addressing here. The Theory of Evolution by Natural Selection is our best explanation for the fact of evolution. It has been tested and scrutinised for over 150 years, and is supported by all the relevant observations.

Next time someone tries to tell you that evolution is just a theory, as a way of dismissing it, as if it's just something someone guessed at, remember that they're using the non-scientific meaning of the word. If that person is a teacher, or minister, or some other figure of authority, they should know better. In fact, they probably do, and are trying to mislead you.5

Evolution is not just a theory, it's triumphantly a theory!

http://www.notjustatheory.com/index.html