Benarkah Piramid Tertua Di Dunia Berada Di Indonesia?

hussaini4675 · Post time 16-1-2019 01:25 PM

Kredit foto: Danny Hilman Natawidjaja

Gunung Padang di Jawa Barat, Indonesia yang diiktiraf sebagai tapak megalitik terbesar di Asia Tenggara dikatakan bukan sebuah gunung, sebaliknya ia didakwa sebagai struktur piramid tertua di dunia.

Science Alert melaporkan, dakwaan itu dibentangkan oleh sekumpulan saintis Indonesia dalam Mesyuarat Musim Luruh Persatuan Geofizik Amerika (AGU) di Washington D.C., Amerika Syarikat bulan lalu.

Penyelidikan yang diketuai oleh ahli geofizik dari Institut Sains Indonesia, Danny Hilman Natawidjaja itu mendapati gunung setinggi 885 meter dari paras laut tersebut adalah struktur purba yang berusia sekurang-kurangnya 10,000 tahun.

Pemandangan Gunung Padang dari jauh. Kredit foto: Carian Google

Mereka mendakwa, struktur piramid itu bukan sahaja meliputi kawasan puncak gunung, malah di kawasan cerun sekitaranya merangkumi keluasan kira-kira 15 hektar.

Kaedah yang digunakan untuk mencapai rumusan itu termasuk dengan menggunakan radar penembusan tanah, tomografi seismik dan ekskavasi arkeologi.

Struktur Gunung Padang mempunyai empat lapisan.

Kredit foto: Danny Hilman Natawidjaja

Struktur piramid Gunung Padang dikatakan terbahagi kepada empat lapisan di mana proses tentu umur radiokarbon menganggarkan lapisan pertama berusia kira-kira 3,500 tahun, lapisan kedua kira-kira 8,000 tahun dan lapisan kedua antara 9,500 hingga 28,000 tahun.

Lapisan keempat yang belum diketahui usianya diperbuat daripada batu basalt lava gunung berapi yang dibentuk oleh manusia.

Danny berpandangan, struktur yang membentuk Gunung Padang itu mungkin mempunyai kaitan dengan aspek keagamaan.

"Ia merupakan sebuah kuil yang unik," jelasnya.

Sekiranya dakwaan itu dibuktikan benar, piramid yang ditemukan di Indonesia itu adalah lebih tua berbanding struktur purba berusia lebih 5,000 tahun di Mesir. - CARI

NmeeraR · Post time 16-1-2019 02:21 PM

Uniknyaa... Indo byk tempat peninggalan sejarah best2, laut n pemandangan pun cantik..

sbb duduk dekat Lingkaran api pasifik kot.. ada gunung berapi lebih 100.

kucingitam · Post time 16-1-2019 02:29 PM

done claim!

kaklong32 · Post time 16-1-2019 02:53 PM

hambek laaaaa

munchkin · Post time 16-1-2019 03:16 PM

Semua dialah.

melnanzz · Post time 16-1-2019 03:30 PM

Jap jap... Gunung Padang ni buatan manusia ke? Kalau betul buatan manusia baru boleh qualify jadi pyramid kan.

Levespa · Post time 16-1-2019 03:58 PM

melnanzz: Jap jap... Gunung Padang ni buatan manusia ke? Kalau betul buatan manusia baru boleh qualify jadi pyramid kan.

saintis indo tu claim gunung tu piramid buatan manusia la..

Sang_Pencinta · Post time 16-1-2019 03:59 PM

Awas, saintis Indon memang penipu uols, banyak kali kena kantoi termasuk Dr.Danny ni

Sikit2 penipuan konon ada jumpa sesuatu di Indon yang lebih tua dari Egypt!!!, Lebih tua dari Giza!!!! etc etc..

https://www.skepticink.com/lateraltruth/2017/09/23/gunung-padang-last-open-letter-danny-hilman/

Well, Danny:

Older than Egypt! Greater than Giza! In November 2011, the organizer of the Ancient Catastrophe Team, Andi Arief, announced to the world you had found an immense and immensely ancient pyramid inside a mountain in West Java. The evidence was impeccably scientific, including radiocarbon dates and all manner of resistivity and seismic and magnetic remote sensing. You presented the evidence yourself in February 2012, at meetings in Jakarta and Bali, affirming in front of no less a scholar than Stephen Oppenheimer that the mountain was artificial. Gunung Padang for the win!

Except, the mountain in question was not Gunung Padang. It was G. Sadahurip, and it was only one of several pyramid-shaped hills for which similar claims were made: Lalakon, Putri, Kaledong, Haruman, up to eighteen altogether including G. Padang. What happened to all those other pyramids, Danny? I should have thought you’d be presenting them proudly as further evidence of your advanced pre-Holocene civilization, and yet—as far as I could find—they vanished from your narrative not long after those announcements were made. Why did Gunung Padang suddenly become an only child?

Well, it helps to look at some recent history. Your account of the discovery of Gunung Padang, as also retailed by Graham Hancock and Co, implies that you stumbled on your great discovery in the course of other research—that you were not looking for an ancient civilization, and were rather surprised when you found one. But let’s go back a bit, and look at the context.

Somewhere around 2008 or 2009, while you were doing valuable work mapping seismic faults in West Java, two books were translated into Bahasa and caught the public imagination: Stephen Oppenheimer’s Eden in the East: The Drowned Continent of Southeast Asia, first published in 1999; and the late Arysio dos Santos’ Atlantis: The Lost Continent Finally Found, first published in 2005. Both posit huge importance for pre-Holocene Indonesia. Oppenheimer’s thesis is a respectable (though minority) alternative to the Out-of-Taiwan hypothesis, whereby Asia was peopled northward from Sundaland rather than southward from Taiwan. Santos’ tome is a cranky masterpiece of pseudoscholarship that places Plato’s Atlantis in Sundaland, a fabulous advanced civilization destroyed when an eruption of Krakatau breached the Java Strait and flooded the lowlands among the present islands. The books’ effect, it seems, was a great boost to the national ego, reverberating right up into the presidential palace.