|
|
When people want to understand, or ask you to explain about things, they are actually asking for another person to explain it in term of them, of what they think to be true. So, most can only see what they want to see.
btw usopp, what i talk above is generalization and not specifically about you. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply #201 hamizao's post
btw hami, why the change of quote?
where goes beingness? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply #202 Agul's post
Well, the last time I read this thread IS of Science, Technology and Mathematics. Any opinion may be expressed in that context too.
I do like the Theory of Everything thing. I wonder if it's the same as the unified theory? Any takers? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply #204 Agul's post
|
You may call it rebranding ...heheheh. Khalil Jilbran gone home. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply #205 hamizao's post
Yeah, but the lowest I think you can go is modern physics eventhough it's still limited. Former mechanical physics just don't't cut it.
If you went deeper into TOE, unified theory, all the stuff of modern physics and how physicalities really is, you'll see that we are in a really big cosmic soup of energy. Which may or may not exist since everything is only perception of mind projection, and there are absolutely no objectivities in the world.
The mind like to label, understand. This topic is still in the level of mind, but you can come to certain speculation. However to see the absolute truth, one have to go beyond the mind. may be mind boggling, or just boggling.
At this moment, to me this seems to be an exercise in futility. And you won't find the answer in a million years, but it's good to pass up time. However, you might find out the answer if you can upgrade it to the level just above the mind. Beyond thinking and knowledge. Just knowing, or being. Btw, this is as scientific as it is. Maybe a little above the realm of Edison pragmatic scientific approach, up to the realm Tesla and above operates in.
Ok, ok just go on discussing. Yaayyy!
I once know a good site on toe, not sure where it is, right now they are working to prove this,in a grand scientific studies that may takes couple of decades, or more. Or you may be interested to read on The Elegant Universe, by Brian Greene. At least a little bit of light can be found there. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply #206 hamizao's post
|
ha ha, this one maybe little bit funkier. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply #198 ussopp's post
|
bertanya tu kan bagus Ussops becoz if u rather ap[proach in non confrontational way then it will be a heakthy good discussion in anything...so yes.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hai Hami not a goosebumps
not really a mature person like thsi forumner Paparock will alway write good, mature answer as u could noice on this thread in the previous pages Hami , these are great people, outside the cyberscape they are doc, engineers and what u knpw Hami just look how much questions ..tonnes and loads of questions were thrown at them and they answered ~ the key is the perception....if u think that person who asked alot is only meant to challenged or to bring u down you kan Hami, then it is sad lah kot kan Hami , ? if u think it makes you grow and brush up ur communication skills then it's ok, kan Hami?U cannot expect every one faham u at the instant ....and my weakness is i malas nak elaborate huhuhu as i always finda way to escape by saying tak per lah u tak faham tak poer but it is pretty rude for me lah actually so sorry and i know it's very annoying....so my mistake.
[ Last edited by mbhcsf at 13-6-2008 02:09 PM ] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
eh Ussop
|
a person like Mail golok is good for quentum discussion , it is just that i could net get him here..ntah dah boring kot kat sini sebab tak der yg the "usual" regulars...that 's what keeps this board going |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originally posted by mbhcsf at 12-6-2008 06:06 PM 
hi handsome ,, what have u gotta say?hmm?
all those the event horizon and so forth ?
Ussop are u into this thing? the quantum etc etc? let us talk about ur field of reserach ...boleh tak?
event horizan? why? r u discussing about this? aku jenguk jer, x bace post kowang... ahahaha... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originally posted by ussopp at 12-6-2008 06:21 PM
saya tak kerja lagi....tgh stadi in mechatronic engineering....tapi saya memang minat fizik tapi tak dapat masa apply dulu....
walopun tak dapat tapi rasanya tak dak masalah sebab saya buleh t ...
sye ade 1 website yg menarik utk belajar fizik part time.. PM sye... 
[ Last edited by aku_EnSeM at 13-6-2008 02:44 PM ] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originally posted by Arissa_Sofea at 13-1-2007 07:15 AM
tu taktaulaa...tak pnah ader eksperimen yang boleh tunjuk apa jadi....
tapi setakat data yang boleh dicollect...kita hanya tau apa akan jadi sampai kat event horizon jer....kat situ tidal ...
ahaha... n disitulah terletaknye sume sampah2 universe... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originally posted by Arissa_Sofea at 14-10-2006 01:29 AM
Halaju lebih dari kelajuan cahaya....according to current theory is possible....
1st, further elaboration of relativity theory dan experimental observation, scientist theorize that dalam space 4 ...
ahaha.. that is really great... but i think, speed kite dlm subspace tu still restricted to below c kan? Xtau betul ke x... hehehe...
Imagine that kite ni tinggal dlm dunia 1 dimension jer. N 2 galaxy terletak kt hujung diameter bulatan. Utk org dlm world 1 dimension ni, diorg kene travel along the circumference and it takes them ages to travel form the 1st to the second galaxy.. Namun if they somehow are able to enter the 2nd dimension, they can now travel along the diameter of the circle and it takes shorter time for them to travel between the galaxies. Relative to the 1-dimensional universe, they travel faster than c but in the 2-D world, they are still restricted to the speed of light limit...
Tp in this case of subspace, tatau r analogy ni boleh pakai ke x.. Cuma sye rse klu diorg travel through subspace, speed diorg dlm subspace tu still less than c but relative to any body who lives in our 3+1D universe, they travel faster than light... Betul ker nie? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originally posted by aku_EnSeM at 13-6-2008 02:41 PM
Neraka n black hole? kekeke... tak tau r, uni x ajar bende tu...
Nk ckp neraka tu black hole ker? uhuhuhu... Tp bg aku_EnSeM (ensem ker? hahaha) diorg mungkin share properties tertentu, ...
yap, bukan suma tapi tertentu, dan apa yg saya nak higlight ialah pasal api warna hitam tu....which both hell and black hole have. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply #210 mbhcsf's post
|
I am sorry but could you please write in a more intelligible way. A bit hard to understand. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply #221 Agul's post
|
aik? ade org gaduh ker? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Category: Belia & Informasi
|
Post time 13-6-2008 12:48 AM
Programmer jer yg gune teori ni selalu...
Post time 13-6-2008 03:52 PM
so sy betul2 nak go slow....
![[tvN/Disney+ 2024] LOVE YOUR ENEMY - Ju Ji Hoon, Jung Yu Mi ~ 23 November 2024](https://uf.cari.com.my/forumx/mforum/forum/202410/27/195716xn6boequdz6b01uq.jpg)