|
|
FIA FORMULA ONE 2008 (GRAN PREMIO DE ESPANA TELEFONICA SPAIN 27 APRIL 2008)
[Copy link]
|
|
|
Reply #18 Azhargoth's post
alonso ke renault kot
mcm konfom je.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply #18 Azhargoth's post
alonso ke renault kot
mcm konfom je.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply #18 Azhargoth's post
server hang
patut pakai amd
[ Last edited by weta_studio at 15-11-2007 11:58 AM ] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply #19 weta_studio's post
|
most probably ler bro...tu je yg tinggal.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dlm banyak2 team tulah jer team yg terbaik yg tinggal utk Alonso... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originally posted by weta_studio at 14-11-2007 03:04 PM 
http://images.gpupdate.net/large/88632.jpg
http://images.gpupdate.net/large/88630.jpg
http://images.gpupdate.net/large/88612.jpg
http://images.gpupdate.net/large/88606.jpg
WELCOME BACK
Ohhh Abe Schumi...I miss u too... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originally posted by weta_studio at 14-11-2007 03:04 PM
http://images.gpupdate.net/large/88632.jpg
http://images.gpupdate.net/large/88630.jpg
http://images.gpupdate.net/large/88612.jpg
http://images.gpupdate.net/large/88606.jpg
WELCOME BACK
Ohhh Abe Schumi...I miss u too... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Badoer: TC ban will separate men from boys
Luca Badoer claims F1 is more enjoyable when driver aids such as traction control are prohibited and lauded Michael Schumacher's pace in testing.
Teams taking part in the winter testing at Barcelona are running cars free of technology that makes driving easier.
And Ferrari's test driver believes that this will make racing more of a challenge.
"The F1 cars had become too easy: if a new guy came in and did some good lap times, a star was born," Badoer told Gazzetta dello Sport. "Now, by contrast, they are harder, so more enjoyable: you need sensitivity and capability in managing the throttle.
"Of course, by the end of winter we'll lap on the same times as this year, but we'll see the difference between who is truly good and the rest."
Schumacher topped the time sheets on his return to the cockpit of the Prancing Horse, but the 26-year-old Italian was not surprised at the seven-time World Champion's performance.
"I'm not surprised, I know him, he is a superhero," he added. "Everybody knows he is the fastest driver in the world, so I don't see what upsets that can cause.
"Raikkonen is quick too, but Schumi in his career has demonstrated to be something else." |
Rate
-
1
View Rating Log
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
hoiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
World title hearing takes place today
The four-man panel of the Court of Appeal will meet in London later today to consider McLaren's appeal against the Brazilian race stewards' decision not to penalise Williams' Nico Rosberg and BMW drivers Robert Kubica and Nick Heidfeld over fuel irregularities.
All three drivers were found to be running cool fuel during the Interlagos race, however, the stewards opted not to penalise them, citing "insufficient evidence" as the reason.
But McLaren appealed the stewards' ruling as cool fuels are against the Formula One regulations.
The Woking team will now have their day in court, although there's a lot more than just the Brazilian Grand Prix result resting on the outcome - there's also the Drivers' Championship title.
The title was awarded to Kimi Raikkonen after the grand prix as his Interlagos victory put him one point ahead of Lewis Hamilton in the standings as the McLaren driver could only manage seventh place.
However, should Rosberg, Kubica and Heidfeld, who all finished ahead of the Brit in the race classifications, be penalised or even disqualified it would promote Hamilton up the order.
And that would give him the World title.
Moving from seventh place to fourth would net the 22-year-old a further three World Championship points, effectively putting him two points ahead of Raikkonen and handing him the World title.
McLaren, though, have already come out and said that today's appeal has nothing to do with wanting to win the World title for Hamilton. Rather it's about wanting clarification about the rules.
"Finding a way to award the Drivers' Championship to Lewis is not what this is about," said McLaren CEO Martin Whitmarsh.
"Victory for us would be a clarification of the rationale for the decision, which we regard as essential to enable all teams to race in compliance with the regulations in 2008."
That's probably a good thing because FIA President Max Mosley recently said that even if the race classification is altered by today's hearing it doesn't not necessarily mean Hamilton will win the World title.
"It could happen, absolutely, because this will go to a court of appeal," Mosley recently said of today's hearing. "It consists of very senior lawyers who are not connected with any of the countries involved in the events, so not Britain, not Italy and so on. It's an independent court. It can decide.
"That said, it's very unlikely, because even if they excluded those cars they are not obliged to reclassify Hamilton. There's absolutely no need, if they don't wish to, to change the position that Hamilton was in." |
Rate
-
1
View Rating Log
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Whitmarsh: Appeal not about the title
Martin Whitmarsh claims that McLaren do not want to win the World Championship in the court room - but says the team will not withdraw their appeal.
A verdict is expected in the 'cool fuel' saga tomorrow that could see Lewis Hamilton awarded the title retrospectively.
And McLaren's CEO admits that the appeal is negative, but insists it was necessary to go to the Court of Appeal to seek clarification of the rules.
"It would not be good but we do all need to know how the rules and procedures will operate going forward," Whitmarsh told Autosport.
"We ourselves lost a constructors' championship at the International Court of Appeal in 1999 when it was, in effect, retrospectively awarded to Ferrari when the ruling of the Stewards that their bargeboards were illegal was overturned. We were upset but we accepted it."
In a season dogged by scandal and skullduggery, McLaren approached the Court after the Brazilian Stewards chose to clear BMW and Williams - even though there was evidence that these teams used fuel below the minimum temperature dictated by the regulations.
Should this decision be reversed, Hamilton could be moved up the classification. But Whitmarsh does not think that this would be a 'victory' for McLaren.
"I don't want to anticipate the verdict of the FIA International Court of Appeal judges," Whitmarsh said.
"Besides, it depends what you mean by 'victory'. Like all true devotees of motor sport, we would never like to see a Drivers' Championship decided in court rather than on track.
"Finding a way to award the drivers' championship to Lewis retrospectively is not at all, however, what this is about."
Whitmarsh claims that the Woking team were bemused by the Stewards' decision and are simply appealing so as to achieve some clarity in the matter.
"We were mystified by the FIA Stewards' decision," he said. "According to the FIA Stewards' own colleague, the FIA's Technical Delegate Jo Bauer, the Williams and BMW-Sauber cars were found to have been refuelled with fuel that had been chilled to a level below which we thought the regulations would allow, thereby giving a performance advantage.
"The FIA Stewards, however, decided not to exclude those cars from the race classification. We didn't understand why that was then, and we don't understand it now.
"So 'victory', for us, would be a clarification of the rationale behind the FIA Stewards' decision at the 2007 Brazilian Grand Prix - a clarification, indeed, that we regard as essential not only for us but for all our competitors, to enable all teams to race in compliance with the regulation regarding fuel temperatures throughout the 2008 Formula One season."
pirrrraaaaaaahhhhhhhhh
takmau menang konon...takmau menang dalam court appeal buat apa...
BAD LOSER
[ Last edited by hyphrigian at 15-11-2007 09:01 PM ] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Martin Whitmarsh claims that McLaren do not want to win the World Championship in the court room - but says the team will not withdraw their appeal.
A verdict is expected in the 'cool fuel' saga tomorrow that could see Lewis Hamilton awarded the title retrospectively.
And McLaren's CEO admits that the appeal is negative, but insists it was necessary to go to the Court of Appeal to seek clarification of the rules.
"It would not be good but we do all need to know how the rules and procedures will operate going forward," Whitmarsh told Autosport.
"We ourselves lost a constructors' championship at the International Court of Appeal in 1999 when it was, in effect, retrospectively awarded to Ferrari when the ruling of the Stewards that their bargeboards were illegal was overturned. We were upset but we accepted it."
In a season dogged by scandal and skullduggery, McLaren approached the Court after the Brazilian Stewards chose to clear BMW and Williams - even though there was evidence that these teams used fuel below the minimum temperature dictated by the regulations.
Should this decision be reversed, Hamilton could be moved up the classification. But Whitmarsh does not think that this would be a 'victory' for McLaren.
"I don't want to anticipate the verdict of the FIA International Court of Appeal judges," Whitmarsh said.
"Besides, it depends what you mean by 'victory'. Like all true devotees of motor sport, we would never like to see a Drivers' Championship decided in court rather than on track.
"Finding a way to award the drivers' championship to Lewis retrospectively is not at all, however, what this is about."
Whitmarsh claims that the Woking team were bemused by the Stewards' decision and are simply appealing so as to achieve some clarity in the matter.
"We were mystified by the FIA Stewards' decision," he said. "According to the FIA Stewards' own colleague, the FIA's Technical Delegate Jo Bauer, the Williams and BMW-Sauber cars were found to have been refuelled with fuel that had been chilled to a level below which we thought the regulations would allow, thereby giving a performance advantage.
"The FIA Stewards, however, decided not to exclude those cars from the race classification. We didn't understand why that was then, and we don't understand it now.
"So 'victory', for us, would be a clarification of the rationale behind the FIA Stewards' decision at the 2007 Brazilian Grand Prix - a clarification, indeed, that we regard as essential not only for us but for all our competitors, to enable all teams to race in compliance with the regulation regarding fuel temperatures throughout the 2008 Formula One season."
pirrrraaaaaaahhhhhhhhh
takmau menang konon...takmau menang dalam court appeal buat apa...
BAD LOSER |
Rate
-
1
View Rating Log
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Martin Whitmarsh claims that McLaren do not want to win the World Championship in the court room - but says the team will not withdraw their appeal.
A verdict is expected in the 'cool fuel' saga tomorrow that could see Lewis Hamilton awarded the title retrospectively.
And McLaren's CEO admits that the appeal is negative, but insists it was necessary to go to the Court of Appeal to seek clarification of the rules.
"It would not be good but we do all need to know how the rules and procedures will operate going forward," Whitmarsh told Autosport.
"We ourselves lost a constructors' championship at the International Court of Appeal in 1999 when it was, in effect, retrospectively awarded to Ferrari when the ruling of the Stewards that their bargeboards were illegal was overturned. We were upset but we accepted it."
In a season dogged by scandal and skullduggery, McLaren approached the Court after the Brazilian Stewards chose to clear BMW and Williams - even though there was evidence that these teams used fuel below the minimum temperature dictated by the regulations.
Should this decision be reversed, Hamilton could be moved up the classification. But Whitmarsh does not think that this would be a 'victory' for McLaren.
"I don't want to anticipate the verdict of the FIA International Court of Appeal judges," Whitmarsh said.
"Besides, it depends what you mean by 'victory'. Like all true devotees of motor sport, we would never like to see a Drivers' Championship decided in court rather than on track.
"Finding a way to award the drivers' championship to Lewis retrospectively is not at all, however, what this is about."
Whitmarsh claims that the Woking team were bemused by the Stewards' decision and are simply appealing so as to achieve some clarity in the matter.
"We were mystified by the FIA Stewards' decision," he said. "According to the FIA Stewards' own colleague, the FIA's Technical Delegate Jo Bauer, the Williams and BMW-Sauber cars were found to have been refuelled with fuel that had been chilled to a level below which we thought the regulations would allow, thereby giving a performance advantage.
"The FIA Stewards, however, decided not to exclude those cars from the race classification. We didn't understand why that was then, and we don't understand it now.
"So 'victory', for us, would be a clarification of the rationale behind the FIA Stewards' decision at the 2007 Brazilian Grand Prix - a clarification, indeed, that we regard as essential not only for us but for all our competitors, to enable all teams to race in compliance with the regulation regarding fuel temperatures throughout the 2008 Formula One season."
pirrrraaaaaaahhhhhhhhh
takmau menang konon...takmau menang dalam court appeal buat apa...
BAD LOSER |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gila babi server....................................... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
woiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
haram J................... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
setan sungguhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Good morning everibodi...... serber baru ok. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originally posted by hyphrigian at 15-11-2007 08:51 PM 
Badoer: TC ban will separate men from boys
Luca Badoer claims F1 is more enjoyable when driver aids such as traction control are prohibited and lauded Michael Schumacher's pace in testing.
...
Ni tak sabar tunggu race next year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Author
Post time 15-11-2007 01:19 PM
