[UNSOLVED MYSTERIES] Empat Kes Misteri Oleh KILL_NANCY #1611-#1614 (21 Januari

Ipo

salmon-suki replied at 9-12-2017 10:33 PM
Very disturbing..sy first time dgr kes junko ni kt rob dyke pny channel and terus search tp rasa m ...

dari pembacaan kisah sadis ni, pembunuh ni dah tahap yakuza dan ada link dengan yakuza

Ipo

Pengenalan sejarah mangsa dan pembunuh.

MANGSA JUNKO FURUTA

Junko Furuta dilahirkan pada 18th of January 1971.  Dia adalah seorang yang cerdik dan terkenal dalam kalangan kawan-kawannya. Selepas tamat belajar dari high  school empat bulan kemudian iaitu bulan Mac, dia mula bekerja di sebuah syarikat pada April 1988. Pada 25th  November 1988 sekitar jam 8:30PM, Junko menaiki basikal pulang ke rumah selepas habis kerja part time kerana ingin menonton episod terakhir drama kegemarannya.

           

PEMBUNUH A

Pembunuh ‘A’, ketua dalam kumpulan 4 pembunuh Junko itu, dilahirkan pada April 1970 , anak lelaki pertama dalam keluarganya.  Dengan kedua ibu bapa bekerja dan memperolehi pendapatan yang baik, keluarga  A hidup agak mewah tetapi tidak bahagia kerana ibu bapa A selalu bergaduh.   ‘A’ mula menunjukkan sikap agresifnya sejak di sekolah rendah dengan mencuri, membuli dan merosakkan harta awam. Memandang A menjadi semakin tidak terkawal (violent), ayahnya pergi ke sekolah untuk meminta nasihat.

Semasa di pertengahan sekolah di sekolah menengah, A telah lulus persekolahannya selama tiga tahun tanpa sebarang masalah. A menjadi salah seorang yang mempunyai kemahiran dalam judo dan secara tak langsung telah memberikan rekod yang baik pada dirinya dan juga pihak sekolah. Dia kemudiannya telah berpindah ke sekolah menengah yang lebih baik atas dasar dia sangat bagus dalam judo. Namun, ketika di sekolah baru, latihan judonya tidak seperti yang disangkakan, ianya sangat tegas dan sering dibuli pelajar-pelajar senior.   Hasilnya, setengah tahun kemudian, A meninggalkan kelab judo dan setengah tahun berikutnya, dia berhenti sekolah.  A mula bekerja sebagai 'Tiler' dan dalam masa yang sama, dia join satu geng motorsikal.

Bermula dari situ, A mula melakukan kesalahan jenayah yang membabitkan kecederaan tubuh manusia, memecah masuk ke dalam bangunan dan merompak. Disebabkan itu, A ditempatkan di bawah pengawasan polis. A meninggalkan kumpulan motorsikal dan kembali bekerja sebagai Tiler semula. Sepanjang bekerja, bosnya senang dengan sikapnya  yang rajin. Semua itu kerana dia berniat untuk mengahwini teman wanita (kakak kepada pembunuh D) dan dia mula menyimpan wang. Pada May 1988, A telah memperolehi lesen memandu dan kerana kesungguhannya, ayahnya telah membeli sebuah kereta pada bulan Julai. Sekitar August, bagaimanapun, A mula tidak berpuas hati dengan pendapatannya dan mula tidak hadirkan diri ke tempat kerja. A mula membuat kerja lain melalui seorang kenalan yakuza yang dikenali memalui seorang kawan sekelasnya dulu. A mula bekerja sebagai Tekiya, menjual barangan berjenama yang palsu, dan menjaga pejabat yakuza. A juga mula menghidu paint thinner.

PEMBUNUH B

Dilahirkan pada May 1971.  Kedua ibu bapanya berpisah ketika dia masih kecil. B tinggal dengan ibu dan seorang kakak. Hanya dua bulan saja dia menghabiskan masa bersama ayah ketika usianya 10 tahun. Bagus dalam sukan, B tidak menunjukkan sebarang tanda sebagai seorang 'troublemaker' sehinggal dia menderita sakit akibat keretakan tulang pada kaki kiri ketika bermain ski pada Jan 1986. Tak boleh bersukan lagi, B mula menjadi malas belajar dan dibuang sekolah pada November 1987. B mula bekerja sebagai pelatih dalam bidang elektrik, dia kemudian mengambil kelas malam tetapi tidak lama. Dia hilang minat dan mula tidak hadir ke kelas. Pada Julai 1988, B diletakkan di bawah pengawasan polis bila dia didapati bersalah menunggang motorsikal tanpa lesen.

PEMBUNUH C

Lahir pada bulan December 1972.  Kedua ibubapanya bekerja dalam bidang yang sama, ayah seorang pharmacist dan ibu seorang jururawat. C mempunyai seorang abang yang lahir pada Januari 1972. Masa di sekolah rendah, C mula membawa masalah kepada pihak sekolah dengan mengugut dan mencuri di kedai-kedai. Masuk sekoalh menengah, kelakuan jenayah semakin menjadi-jadi. Dia juga memberontak ke atas ayahnya sendiri. Selepas tamat belajar sekolah menengah pada Mac 1988 dan mula masuk ke sekolah tinggi, C menunjukkan kelakuan yang semakin teruk. C tidak hadir kelas, tidak pulang ke rumah pada waktu malam, bergaul dengan orang yang tidak senonoh, ganas ketika di rumah, akhirnya dia meninggalkan sekolah pada September 1988. Kedua ibubapa C tidak dapat mengawal kelakuan C, mereka mula pasrah. Sejak itu, C yang satu bilik dengan abangnya mula menjadikan bilik atas rumah mereka itu sebagai tempat lepak bersama geng gangster yang lain memandangkan kedua ibubapa mereka sentiasa sibuk dan tidak ada di rumah.    C juga diletakkan di bawah pengawasan polis selepas ditahan menunggang motorsikal tanpa lesen.

PEMBUNUH D

Remaja ini dilahirkan pada December 1971.  Ibubapanya berpisah ketika umurnya 4 tahun dan bercerai dua tahun kemudian. Ayah D terbunuh dalam kemalangan selepas itu. D kemudiannya dibesarkan oleh mak dan kakaknya. D juga pernah menghadiri kelas malam tetapi berhenti seminggu kemudian dan meninggalkan sekolah pada September 1986. Pada October 1986, D diletakkan di bawah pengawasan pihak polis atas kesalahan domestic violence. Pada Jun 1987 dan Mac 1988, dia didakwa atas kesalahan jenayah kecil. D cuba beberapa kerja tetapi tidak bertahan lama semuanya.

Keempat-empat pembunuh itu pernah belajar di sekolah yang sama. Rumah C mempunyai dua bilik tidur di tingkat atas di mana salah satu bilik itu dihuni oleh abang C, iaitu E.  Dengan kedua ibubapa mereka sibuk dan sentiasa tidak ada di rumah, dua bilik ini menjadi tempat lepak C dan E bersama geng sekepala mereka sejak musim panas 1988 di mana mereka bebas melakukan apa saja.   B yang sama grade dengan E ketika di sekolah, mula lepak di rumah C. Pada October 1988, motorsikal E telah dicuri dan A mula datang ke rumah C menolong E mencari motorsikalnya yang hilang. A mula membuat satu kumpulan remaja pengganas yang kecil. A ditakuti oleh ahli yang lain dia sebagai ketua kumpulan, dia mula menubuh kumpulan yang bertindak seperti yakuza. B menjadi penolong  A dan menjadi pengganti A semasa ketiadaan A.

Ipo

KRONOLOGI KES

In the evening of the 25th of November 1988, A and C were wandering about on separate mopeds in Misato, Saitama Prefecture, with the purpose of snatching bags or raping young women.  Spotting Junko cycling home at around 8:30PM, A told C to “kick that woman”.  C did so and left the scene immediately.  Junko fell to the side.  A approached her saying, “That one’s crazy; I’ve been threatened by him with a knife a short time ago.  You may still be in danger.  Let me walk you home”.

Where Junko’s bicycle was kicked.  A woman points where she found Junko’s locked bike.

    

Gaining Junko’s trust, A lured her into a nearby warehouse where he dropped his pretence and raped her, saying:  “I’m his mate and we are both yakuza.  If you obey me, I will spare your life.  Let me have sex with you; if you scream you’re dead.”  He then took her to a hotel by taxi where he raped her again.  From the hotel A rang C’s home, their usual hangout, and told B that he succeeded in raping the girl.  B asked him to keep her, and at around 0:30AM on the 26th of November, A, Junko, B, C and D met up in a park.  After a talk between A and B, they decided to abduct and imprison her. They told her that they knew where she lived from her student notebook (which every student was expected to carry with them while in uniform) and that they would get yakuza to kill all of her family if she tried to escape.  She was taken to C’s house in the Ayase district of Adachi, Tokyo, easily overpowered, and repeatedly gang-raped.

Below:  C’s house

    

On the 27th of November, Junko’s worried parents asked the police to search for her.  However, the gang forced Junko to call her home three times between the end of November and the middle of December.  She was made to tell her parents that she had run away from home, was safe with friends, and she wanted the police search to be stopped.

At the beginning of December, when the gang were asleep, Junko rang the police, but was stopped by A before she could say anything.  The police immediately phoned back, but A told them it was a mistake.  Angered by her act, they started to torture her.  She was repeatedly punched, kicked, struck by heavy objects, foreign objects inserted into private parts, skin burned with cigarette lighters.  They also stopped feeding her.  Due to both external and internal injuries and malnutrition, she could hardly walk and had to crawl downstairs to the bathroom.  When she could no longer crawl, she was made to urinate into a cup and was forced to drink her own urine.  Because of the unbearable violence and pain, Junko repeatedly begged them to kill her.  Ignoring her pleas, they continued the torture for days.

The brutality of the attacks changed Junko’s appearance completely.  Her badly beaten face was so swollen that her cheeks were as high as her nose.  Her burned and infected skin produced body fluid with a bad smell.  The gang no longer had sexual interest in her.  To fulfill their desires, at around 2:30AM on the 27th of December 1988, the four abducted a 19-year-old woman on her way home.  They pushed her into A’s car, threatened her with a knife, took her into a motel room and gang-raped her.  Even before abducting Junko, A, B and C had committed a similar gang-rape on the 8th of November.

When January 1989 arrived, the gang talked about what to do with Junko.  “Kill and bury her?”  “Let’s mince her body after killing.”  “We can burn her in an oil drum.”  “Fill the drum with concrete and throw it into the sea.  The police would never find it.”

In the early hours of the 4th of January 1989, after losing a lot of money playing mahjong, a frustrated A visited D’s house. B and C were also present.  After playing computer games for a while, A decided to vent his anger by beating Junko where she lay, barely alive.  The attack started at around 8AM.  Junko was punched, kicked, had her face covered in hot wax, with two short candles placed on her eyelids.  She hardly responded.  They made her stand and struck her face with swinging kicks.  Defenceless Junko fell onto a stereo and collapsed.  She started a fit of convulsions.

The gang knew Junko might die, but did not stop.  She bled from her nose and mouth, and bloody pus emerged from her burns.  Blood spattered all over the room.  Reluctant to get blood on his fists, D covered his hands with plastic bags and taped them around the wrists before punching Junko in the stomach and shoulders twenty or thirty times.  A, B and C imitated D and covered their hands in bags.  They took turns to punch and kick Junko in the face, stomach and thighs.  They also struck Junko in the thighs many times with a heavy iron ball which was part of C’s kick boxing exercise machine.  D dropped the iron ball onto her stomach several times.  A repeatedly poured lighter fuel on her thighs and set it alight.  Junko initially gestured as if trying to put it off, but gradually became unreactive.

The gang taped around Junko’s ankles so that she could not escape and went out to a sauna.  It is believed that she died in C’s room some time during the last torture or in the hours that followed.

  The next day when A, B and C were at a florist run by yakuza, C’s brother E rang to tell that Junko appeared to be dead.  Afraid of the murder being detected, the three gang members decided to get rid of Junko’s body.  They wrapped her body in two blankets, pushed it into a large travel bag and taped around it.  From his former employer, A borrowed a cement mixer and a truck and took them to his home.  They fetched an oil drum which was used as a litter bin in the neighbourhood.  They placed the travel bag which contained Junko’s body in the drum, threw in some concrete blocks, and filled up with fresh concrete.  The drum was taped into a large black litter bag.  At around 8PM the drum was loaded onto the truck.  They planned to drop it into the sea, but on the way they passed an empty space near a development site and just abandoned it there.

A’s house and drive where they encased Junko’s body in concrete

    

Where the drum was found

On the 23rd of January 1989, A and B were arrested for the gang-rape of a 19-year-old woman in December.  On the 29th of March, two police officers from the Ayase district (where C’s house was) came to interrogate them.  Women’s underwear had been found at their addresses and the police suspected that they might have committed theft as well.

There had been murder of a mother and her 7-year-old son in Ayase district on the 16th of November the previous year, nine days before Junko’s abduction.  As the case had not been solved (and remains so to this day), during the interrogation one officer lightly uttered a trick question to A.  “You mustn’t kill someone, you know”.  However A thought that the officer meant the murder of Junko Furuta, thinking that B in a separate room had already confessed.  “I am sorry that we killed”.  The officers were astounded as it was just a trick.  They went to the empty space accordingly to the confession, where they found a drum with a strange smell.  The 305kg drum was lifted onto a truck by a crane and taken to the police the following day.

  

Junko’s body was found in the drum, badly decomposed as she had been dead for over two months.  Edema all over her body.  Malnutrition.  Facial features unrecognizable due to severe disfigurement.  It had to be identified by fingerprints.  On the 1st of April C was arrested for another sexual assault and was rearrested for murder.  The arrest of D and E followed.

Junko Furuta’s funeral was held on the 2nd of April 1989.  Had she not been murdered, the following day – Monday the 3rd of April – would have been her first day at work.

  

One of Junko’s friends’ memorial address:

Jun-chan, welcome back.  I have never dreamed that we would see you again in this way.  You must have been in so much pain… so much suffering…  The happi we all made for the school festival looked really good on you.  We will never forget you.  I have heard that the headmaster has presented you with a graduation certificate.  So we graduated together – all of us.  Jun-chan, there is no more pain, no more suffering.  Please rest in peace…

    

Below right:  Junko’s father

  

Junko’s would-be employer presented her parents with the uniform she was to wear at work.  It was placed inside her coffin.

  

Despite the shockingly brutal nature of the crime, the identities of the four perpetrators were protected due to all of them being minors at the time of the crime.  Some media however published their names.  On the 12th of July 1991, after overturning the original terms, Tokyo High Court sentenced them as follows.

           

           

A  –  Hiroshi Miyano  :  20 years sentence

A’s mother sent a big sum of money (50 million yen≒USD425k) to Junko’s parents after selling their family home.  A was released in summer 2009.  In January 2013 he was arrested for fraud, but remained silent during interrogation.  Due to insufficient evidence he was released without charge.

B  –  Jo Kamisaku  :  Indefinite 5 – 10 year term

In court it was revealed that B’s father started saving money for compensation to Junko’s parents, despite Junko’s parents’ refusal to accept it.  B was released in August 1999.  Married and divorced a Chinese.  Became close to yakuza again.  In May 2004, B (then aged 31) was arrested for the attack, abduction and imprisonment of a man (Crime File).  During the attack, B boasted that he had “already committed murder” and that he “knew how to coax the police and the prosecutor”.  He was given a four year sentence.  A few sources of information report that B’s mother vandalized Junko’s grave “because she ruined her son’s life”.  A source of information in more recent years states that B’s father’s savings, originally meant for Junko’s parents, had been consumed by B for luxuries.

C  –  Nobuharu Minato  :  Indefinite 5 – 9 year term

C married a Romanian in 2006.

D  –  Yasushi Watanabe  :  Indefinite 5 – 7 year term

Seems to be living with his mother after release.  Has not worked since release.

The location where Junko’s body was abandoned has been developed since and is now a park.

    

C’s parents and brother E were not charged.  Their house in which Junko was forced to spend the last 40 days of her life was demolished after the murder, replaced by a new house owned by a different family.

Before the brutal torture to Junko started, it seems that she once had a meal with C’s family downstairs.  C’s mother told her to return home, only to be shouted at (or hit) by C.  The parents were not allowed to go upstairs, let alone look into their sons’ rooms.

Some may wonder why Junko did not try harder to escape.  Initially I thought so too, but then realized that she did not know what was going to happen to her in the end.  Had she known her fate, she would have desperately tried to escape, desperately begged C’s parents for help.  Her main purpose was to return home.  Afraid of provoking them, I believe she remained “obedient” until she became desperate.

Some sources of information state that C’s parents were not aware of Junko still being held upstairs.  Other sources, however, state that they were aware, but did not interfere because they were too scared of C’s violence.  To me,  it is unbelievable that they could not notice violent torture taking place upstairs.  Average Japanese houses are small.  Even though C’s parents were too busy to spend long hours at home, a home is a home.  I cannot believe they did not know.  I believe they knew, but chose to remain silent.  And the silence resulted in Junko’s death, making their son a murderer.  In my opinion, C’s parents should have been prosecuted too.  C was a “minor” which meant his parents were responsible for their son.  If C was too violent to intervene, they should have gone to the police.  Had they done it, Junko would have been alive today.

A’s mother avoiding a reporter (back in 1989)

  

In the court documents it is stated that all four of the gang “showed deep remorse and pledged to become better members of the society in the future”.  But at least A and B have already betrayed themselves, particularly B who has committed another violent crime.

Gila jahat dorang neh

sumber:https://yumig.wordpress.com/2017/01/05/the-28th-anniversary-of-the-death-of-junko-furuta/

capiloton

kejam punya manosia.
patut nya kes2 sadis macam ni di hukum tembak mati jer.
minor or not.
jangan di biar genetik korup ni merebak.

salmon-suki

Ipo replied at 10-12-2017 12:58 PM
dari pembacaan kisah sadis ni, pembunuh ni dah tahap yakuza dan ada link dengan yakuza

Lebih drpd yakuza pun ada..mmg bkn manusia dah..tahap binatang dh dorg ni..elok diseksa smpai mati..bg dia rasa betapa peritnya perbuatan dia tu kt junko

paz

Maknanya pembunuh Junko Furuta ni bebas lah hidup macam orang biasa sekarang ni?

Ipo

paz replied at 11-12-2017 10:38 AM
Maknanya pembunuh Junko Furuta ni bebas lah hidup macam orang biasa sekarang ni?

ya, kalau ikut hukuman yang diterima, hanya penjara saja untuk beberapa tahun (paling lama 20 tahun)
pembunuh dibebaskan lepas menjalani hukuman penjara dan kerja macam biasa, kahwin etc
hanya sorang je yang jobless rasanya

pavlovachoc

JulietTheOrange replied at 23-11-2016 11:48 AM
edit

bg link benang zara ..nk menjoyah la kt situ , maklumla newbies

paz

Ipo replied at 11-12-2017 12:11 PM
ya, kalau ikut hukuman yang diterima, hanya penjara saja untuk beberapa tahun (paling lama 20 tahu ...

Seramnya, potensi mereka boleh melakukan bende jahat ni lagi.

aunisofia

awekjepun replied at 8-12-2017 05:48 PM
Sy pun prnh baca dlu..kali nk sy skip je.. xsggup nk ingat smula kisah ni.

kan.....saya skipkan je...tak sanggup baca

Maweexxa

Kes junko ni buat I teringat kes Issei Sagawa. Pembunuh canibal sampai boleh jadi pelakon kat jepun. Undang2 jepun kalau pembunuh mengaku bunuh penjara 20 tahun je? Hukuman gantung lah baru adil.

SelakLangsir

Ipo replied at 4-12-2017 11:39 PM
Kes pembunuhan Junko Furuta

i cannot read baout this lady.
sgt sadist.
all i can say is; this lady was a tough lady; her heart was strong and due to that; dia ble tahan semua seksaan ni yg TT tulis.

thanks TT for this.

nooriesz

berdenyut kepala den baca kisah junko furuta..
sadis sgt.. diseksa mcm tu smpi hari terakhir..

tp tu la.. xder keadillan utk mangsa..

kuzaime

Kes junko ni lama dulu aku pernah baca. Berhari2 aku murung lepas tu..

yayan_froggy90

Penah baca junko furota ni..tp version yakuza yg culik n seksa..taktau pulak bebudak yg buat...kes junko ni sama jugak dgn kes pmpuan muslim yg kena tahan kt penjara n seksa mcm2..pmpuan tu pandai..byk sijil degree..mmg genius.. Tp kena seksa dlm tahanan..tak ingt la namanya.. Adehh..

papadomku

kisah junko furuta ni disturbing sgt. terlalu kejam. tak boleh imagine macam mana pelaku boleh sekejam itu. dan hukuman yg dikenakan kat diorang sangat tak adil utk jenayah yg diorang dah buat

mrizumi

Aku prnh baca kes junko ni dulu..
Mmg sgt kejam lah..
N pnjenayah tu patut dpt hukuman lg berat..lpas kluar pnjara pun xinsaf2 jgk..
N mak ayh si C tu sambil lewa psl aktiviti ank dia..ada jnis mak ayh takut dkt ank2 pnya keganasan..last2 org lain jd mangsa..

xtahumenahu

Nak tau sgt cemana penjenayah2 ni jalani kehidupan diorg sekarang.. Aman2 je ke?

moonbug

KES PEMBUNUHAN JAMES BULGER, 1993



PART 1 OF 3

Pada hari Jumaat 12/02/1993, rakaman CCTV dari New Strand Shopping Centre di Liverpool, Merseyside, menunjukkan Thompson dan Venables (berusia 10 tahun) ponteng sekolah dan melepak di mall itu sambil memerhati kanak-kanak untuk memilih sasaran.

Sepanjang hari, sambil memerhati kanak-kanak, Thompson dan Venables dilihat mencuri pelbagai barangan termasuk gula-gula, anak patung, beberapa bateri dan cat biru; antara barangan yang kemudian dijumpai di tempat pembunuhan.

Salah seorang daripada mereka ketika siasatan mengaku bahawa mereka dari awal telah merancang mencari seorang kanak-kanak untuk diculik, membawa dia ke jalan yang sibuk berdekatan pusat membeli-belah, dan menolaknya ke jalan yang sibuk dan penuh dengan kereta supaya dilanggar.

Pada petang Jumaat itu, James Bulger (2 tahun) dan ibunya Denise pergi ke Pusat Beli Belah New Strand. Semasa sibuk di dalam kedai daging di tingkat bawah sekitar 3:40pm, Denise yang telah melepaskan tangan James untuk beberapa ketika menyedari bahawa James telah hilang.  

Thompson dan Venables telah menghampiri James secara senyap-senyap sebelum mengambil tangannya dan memimpinnya keluar dari mall. Momen ini dirakam kamera CCTV pada jam 3:42pm. Budak-budak lelaki itu membawa James berjalan kaki sejauh 4km ke Liverpool Canal di mana mereka menjatuhkan James menyebabkan James terhantuk kepala dan mengalami kecederaan pada wajahnya. Mereka bergurau dan mengacah menolak James ke dalam kanal. Semasa berjalan kaki di Liverpool, ketiga-tiga mereka dilihat oleh 38 orang saksi.

Walaupun dahi James benjol dan dia menangis sambil berjalan, tiada siapa tampil untuk campur tangan. Masing-masing menganggap bahawa dia adalah adik kecil yang dibawa abang-abangnya.

Dua orang cuba bertanya, tetapi mereka mendakwa James adalah adik mereka atau menyatakan James sesat dan mereka mahu membawanya ke balai polis terdekat.

Akhirnya mereka tiba di perkampungan Walton. Apabila ternampak balai polis Walton Lane, mereka teragak-agak dan menukar haluan. Mereka mengarah James berjalan sehingga ke tebing curam berdekatan sebuah landasan kereta api sekitar stesen keretapi lama Walton & Anfield yang tidak lagi digunakan berhampiran dengan Perkuburan Anfield yang sunyi. Di situ, dua kanak-kanak lelaki itu mula menyeksa si kecil James.

moonbug

PART 2 OF 3



Salah seorang daripada budak lelaki itu memasukkan cat biru yang dicuri di mall ke dalam mata kiri James. Mereka menendang dan memijak James serta melontar batu bata dan batu kerikil pada seluruh badannya. Sebanyak 27 batu bata telah ditampilkan sebagai bahan bukti di mahkamah. Mereka turut menyumbat bateri ke dalam mulut James. Polis percaya beberapa bateri mungkin dimasukkan ke dalam dubur James, walaupun tiada bateri ditemui di situ.

Akhirnya, selepas puas memukul dan menyiksa James, dua budak lelaki itu mengangkat seketul bar besi padu seberat 10 kg yang merupakan plat rel keretapi,  dan menghempasnya ke atas kepala James yang terbaring kesakitan. Akibatnya, James mengalami sekurang-kurangnya 10 keretakan pada tempurung kepalanya. Dia juga mengalami pendarahan dan kecederaan otak yang dahsyat. Ahli patologi kes itu menyatakan bahawa James menderita tersangat banyak kecederaan, (sekurang-kurangnya 42 jenis) sehingga mereka tidak dapat menentukan kecederaan mana yang menjadi punca kematian.

Polis mengesyaki bahawa ada elemen seksual terhadap jenayah itu, memandangkan kasut, stokin, seluar dan seluar dalam James telah ditanggalkan. Laporan patologis yang dibacakan di mahkamah menyatakan bahawa kulit zakar James juga telah ditarik secara paksa. Bagaimanapun kedua budak-budak itu tidak pernah mengakui hal ini sepanjang perjalanan kes sehingga mereka menjalani sesi dengan pakar setelah dewasa.

Sebelum mereka meninggalkannya, budak-budak lelaki itu membaringkan tubuh lemah James di atas trek keretapi dan melitupi wajah dan kepalanya dengan batu-batu, dengan harapan kereta api akan melanggar James dan membuat kematiannya kelihatan seperti satu kemalangan.

Selepas pembunuh-pembunuhnya meninggalkan tempat kejadian, sebuah keretapi meluncur laju dan melanggar tubuh James. Badan si kecil James terputus dua akibat hentaman itu. Mayatnya yang hancur ditemui dua hari kemudian pada 14/02/1993. Ahli patologi forensik memberi keterangan bahawa James telah pun menemui ajal sebelum dia dilanggar oleh kereta api. Ini melegakan ramai pihak yang mengikuti kes sadis ini.

Sebelum mayat James ditemui, polis telah mengekstrak dan mengedarkan rakaman CCTV mall yang menunjukkan momen dia diculik oleh dua "anak muda" pada hari Jumaat. Seorang wanita yang kebetulan tahu kedua budak itu ponteng sekolah pada hari Jumaat dapat mengecam kedua-duanya di dalam rakaman itu. Polis menangkap kedua-dua mereka dan mengalami satu kejutan apabila mengetahui kedua-duanya cuma kanak-kanak sekolah rendah. Hal ini kerana rakaman CCTV yang berkualiti rendah pada tahun 90an cuma memaparkan "dua anak muda" menculik James tetapi tidak dapat dipastikan dengan jelas usia mereka.

Pegawai-pegawai penyiasat kes mula berasa hairan dan muram melihatkan betapa sadis pembunuhan dilakukan penjenayah muda itu.  

Ujian forensik mengesahkan bahawa terdapat kesan cat biru yang sama pada pakaian mereka seperti yang terdapat pada badan James. Kedua-duanya mempunyai darah pada kasut mereka dan darah pada kasut Thompson dipadankan dengan James melalui ujian DNA. Corak kecederaan pada pipi kanan James sepadan dengan ciri-ciri bahagian atas kasut yang dipakai oleh Thompson; tanda cat yang tertanggal pada hujung kasut Venables turut menunjukkan yang dia telah menendang James dengan ganas.