|
|
Lukisan Bernilai Jutaan Dolar Tiba-Tiba Musnah Sendiri, Sejurus Selepas Dilelong
[Copy link]
|
|
|
Sang_Pencinta replied at 8-10-2018 12:51 PM
Ikut Instagram dia Banksy ni memang wierd sikit, dia tak mahu orang komersialkan seni lukisan dia
...
Ooo. Tak pernah tau pasal dia. Ni first time tau. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rasa art dia ni unik & ada aura misteri..
tiba-tiba terminat
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sang_Pencinta replied at 8-10-2018 12:49 PM
Kalau ikut spekulasi media, nilai lukisan yang kini dah separuh cincang tu dan naik sekali ganda L ...
seperti yg aku fikir |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by dani-rox at 8-10-2018 09:57 PM
gimik dari si hipokrit.
banksy berjaya mengaut berjuta2 dollar (collaboration w/ damien hirst, helooo?) hasil acah2 subversive dan anti capitalism. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
dani-rox replied at 8-10-2018 01:56 PM
gimik dari si hipokrit.
banksy berjaya mengaut berjuta2 dollar (collaboration w/ damien hirst, hel ...
Laaa..ye ke..baru nak kagum..choyyy..tapi iols lama dah minat lukisan banksy ni..dari zaman myspace gitu.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
yalorr.. ai dulu pun minat tp lama2 terserlahlah niat sebenar heshe. banksy nih ada company, ada lawyer, wakil khas etc utk memastikan hasil karyanya tidak dipergunakan oleh pihak lain. satu lg, dia pernah buat art project dlm bentuk taman tema ala2 disneyland - "Dismaland". letak koleksi seni yg 'huduh' atas nama sarcasm dan irony. tiket masuk berbayar, dan paling kontroversi bila dia bg special treatment dgn selebriti spt brad pitt utk private tour dlm Dismaland. kata subversive, tp mengamalkan elitism. cemana tuh?? 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oh macam tu ceritanya. Hahaha. Tumpang gelak jah dgn org fake tahap sebegini. Sesuai sangat dinamakan retis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
https://edition.cnn.com/style/ar ... ons-intl/index.html
CNN kata mungkin Banksy berpakat dengan Sotheby untuk gimik tu
Was Banksy in the room during the auction?
There is speculation that Banksy, who has kept his identity hidden for more than 20 years, may have been in the room at the time of the sale, possibly overseeing the whole performance while filming on his phone.
Footage circulating on the internet shows a middle-aged man, wearing thick-rimmed black glasses, filming the moment when the picture is shredded.
Shortly after, the man is seen being escorted out of the room.
Making money by mocking power: Inside the Banksy exhibition
Was that Banksy?
In 2016, scientists at Queen Mary's University in London used geographic profiling, based on the artist's movements, to identify him as a man called Robin Gunningham.
The authors conceded that their study fell short of definitive proof.
The man spotted at Friday's auction bears similarities to Gunningham, leaving internet and art sleuths to suggest it was him.
The angle from which the man was filming could also correspond to the angle used in Banksy's video version of events.
Banksy is known for having tight-lipped collaborators who work with him, and it is also possible he had people placed in the room to record the event.
Erika Rossi, a gallery owner from Italy, who was at the auction, said there was a young man who had been diligently filming throughout who sat in front of her. She also saw a man "arguing with security" after the auction had finished.
Sotheby's says it wasn't in on the stunt
According to the Sotheby's catalogue, the painting had been "acquired directly from the artist by the present owner in 2006." It then said it had been given as a gift.
Is it really credible that Banksy would give the painting away with an embedded, remote-controlled, battery-operated shredder, that would activate 12 years later? At the very least, wouldn't the battery have gone flat?
Commentators also pointed out that Sotheby's staff casually remove the painting after it had acted so strangely. Weren't they afraid of sharp blades reactivating, or of it exploding? In addition, the frame was extremely thick and the shredder would have added weight. Weren't they curious as to why it was so heavy?
In a statement, Sotheby's said, "It is increasingly common in the Contemporary art world for artists to deem their frames integral to the artwork, as was the case in this instance. The certificate from the artist's studio for the present work states that the frame is 'integral to the piece.'
"When Sotheby's asked the studio about removing the work from its frame during the cataloguing process, we were expressly told not to remove the frame. This is not unusual -- consider Lucio Fontana's lacquer frames, or George Condo's frames that include labels on the back saying do not remove from frame. In many cases, if you remove the frame you violate the artist's wishes and destroy the artwork," the statement added.
Experts also wondered why the marquee work was the final lot in the sale. Ordinarily, such a high-profile sale would have come higher up in the running order.
"The big question is -- was Sotheby's complicit," asks Anny Shaw, correspondent for the Art Newspaper, who was in the room for the sale. "Are these signs that they knew? The lower estimate, putting the lot at the very end of the auction."
"If they weren't in on it, this probably one of the best art pranks of the century," Shaw told CNN. "Banksy has really pulled off a corker. If they were in on it, it raises all sorts of questions about the manipulation of the market and it dilutes Banksy's brand. I'd be really disappointed if that's the case."
Sotheby's insists it had no idea about the stunt. "We had no prior knowledge of this event and were not in any way involved," Sotheby's said in a statement.
"We think our auctioneer and European Chairman Oliver Barker described it best from the rostrum this evening: 'A brilliant Banksy moment!' "
Will the painting go up or down in value?
One thing is for sure, the painting may be "damaged" but the art event will go down in art history, and the price may soar as a result.
Art explained: Why is art so expensive?
"I'm unsure if the painting is going to be more valuable or less valuable, but it is definitely going to be his most famous," Banksy's former gallery owner Steve Lazarides told CNN.
"You could argue that the work is now more valuable," said Alex Branczik, Sotheby's head of contemporary art, Europe.
"It's certainly the first work to be spontaneously shredded as an auction ends."
Sotheby's said it was talking to the seller, "who was surprised about the story," about how to proceed.
"Millionaire sells a painting for a million to other millionaires then destroys it," wrote fellow street artist and Banksy friend Ben Eine, known globally for his bold letters, in an Instagram post. "You are going to have to explain this one to me?!?" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hebattt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sayangnya lukisan tu..
Bleh nampak nilai sentimentalnya |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
kekadang peminat dan pengkritik seni terlampau sombong dan pretentious, benda sah2 huduh pun dikata mind provoking lah, inspirational lah. Oleh itu, pernah berlaku dlm sejarah, seorg lelaki bernama Paul Jordan Smith yg bengang apabila para pengkritik merendah2kan lukisan wife beliau, ambik keputusan utk menyamar sbg artist Rusia yg misterius. Hakikatnya seumur hidup Paul tak pernah pegang berus apatah lg menghasilkan painting. Maka dia buat la satu lukisan yg hauk sehauk2nya, letak price tag yg mahal namatey agar takda org sanggup nak beli dan ditandatangani atas nama berbau Rusia nan eksotik. Bermula dari itu, ramai pengkritik2 seluruh dunia memuji2 lukisannya tuh - hingga disamakan sbg masterpiece. Last2 Paul mengakui semua lukisan tu hoax semata2, alasan dia berbuat demikian: ""just to prove most art critics didn't know what they were talking about."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Author |
Post time 10-10-2018 06:24 PM
From the mobile phone
|
Show all posts
dani-rox replied at 8-10-2018 11:36 PM
yalorr.. ai dulu pun minat tp lama2 terserlahlah niat sebenar heshe. banksy nih ada company, ada l ...
So kiranya dia ni mcm pedang dua matalah. At the same time dia konon anti komersial dia juga dpt duit dr jln belakang.
Mcm auction ni pekerja lelong kenapa mcm rilex dan selamba sangat? Lukisan juta juta dicincang tu |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
exactly. ramai saspek Sotheby pun bersekongkol dgn Banksy dlm media stunt nih, supaya nilai lukisan yg dah dihiris2 tu akan meningkat. hence reaksi kayu jati daripada Sotheby's staff
Selama ni Banksy berlagak anti establishment, anti capitalism, rebel etc etc semata2 utk promote brand nya itu. one more thing, seorg forensics expert selepas mengkaji segala dokumen dan paper trails yg ada, percaya Banksy kemungkinan besar adalah Jamie Hewlett, salah seorg ahli kump. Gorillaz.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
dani-rox replied at 9-10-2018 09:25 PM
kekadang peminat dan pengkritik seni terlampau sombong dan pretentious, benda sah2 huduh pun dikat ...
Ye lorr.. kdg tengok punyalah buruk.. tapi dikatakan seni yg amat tinggi.. unik.. koserrr |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
banksy ni memang sorang ke berkumpulan? berapa lama usia lukisan tu sampai boleh jual 1juta usd |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Author |
Post time 11-10-2018 04:30 AM
From the mobile phone
|
Show all posts
hanakikan replied at 11-10-2018 02:20 AM
banksy ni memang sorang ke berkumpulan? berapa lama usia lukisan tu sampai boleh jual 1juta usd
Lukisan tu siap 12 tahun lepas. Banksy kata dia pasang mesin tu di dalam frame sekali dgn battery.
Masalahnya kalau Sotherby tak bersubahat menggantikan takkan battery tu tak habis dlm 12 tahun? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Saje je nak raih publisiti ni. Art dia pun macam murah je acah-acah hipster lah konon.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gorillaz as in Gorillaz yg nyanyi Clint Eastwood tu kah? Serius? 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Post time 8-10-2018 04:14 PM
